Back to Search Start Over

Thinking Outside the Cage: A New Hypothesis That Accounts for Variable Yields of Radicals from the Reaction of CO 2 with ONOO .

Authors :
Koppenol WH
Serrano-Luginbuehl S
Nauser T
Kissner R
Source :
Chemical research in toxicology [Chem Res Toxicol] 2020 Jul 20; Vol. 33 (7), pp. 1516-1527. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 May 20.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

In biology, the reaction of ONOO <superscript>-</superscript> with CO <subscript>2</subscript> is the main sink for ONOO <superscript>-</superscript> . This reaction yields CO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>•-</superscript> , NO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>•</superscript> , NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> , and CO <subscript>2</subscript> . There is a long-standing debate with respect to the yield of the radicals relative to ONOO <superscript>-</superscript> . The reaction of ONOO <superscript>-</superscript> with CO <subscript>2</subscript> results at first in ONOOCO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> . According to one hypothesis, ONOOCO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> is extremely short-lived and devolves into a solvent cage that contains CO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>•-</superscript> and NO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>•</superscript> . Of these solvent cages, approximately two/thirds result in NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> and CO <subscript>2</subscript> , and approximately one/third release CO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>•-</superscript> and NO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>•</superscript> that oxidize the substrate. According to our hypothesis, ONOOCO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> is formed much faster, is relatively long-lived, and may also be an oxidant; the limited yield is the result of ONOOCO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> being scavenged by a second CO <subscript>2</subscript> under conditions of a high CO <subscript>2</subscript> concentration. We disagree with the first hypothesis for three reasons: First, it is based on an estimated K for the reaction of ONOO <superscript>-</superscript> with CO <subscript>2</subscript> to form ONOOCO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> of ∼1 M <superscript>-1</superscript> , while experiments yield a value of 4.5 × 10 <superscript>3</superscript> M <superscript>-1</superscript> . Second, we argue that the solvent cage as proposed is physically not realistic. Given the less than diffusion-controlled rate constant of CO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>•-</superscript> with NO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>•</superscript> , all radicals would escape from the solvent cage. Third, the reported ∼33% radical is not supported by an experiment where mass balance was established. We propose here a hybrid mechanism. After formation of ONOOCO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> , it undergoes homolysis to yield CO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>•-</superscript> with NO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>•</superscript> , or, depending on [CO <subscript>2</subscript> ], it is scavenged by a second CO <subscript>2</subscript> ; CO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>•-</superscript> oxidizes ONOO <superscript>-</superscript> , if present. These reactions allow us to successfully simulate the reaction of ONOO <superscript>-</superscript> with CO <subscript>2</subscript> over a wide range of ONOO <superscript>-</superscript> /CO <subscript>2</subscript> ratios. At lower ratios, fewer radicals are formed, while at higher ratios, radical yields between 30% and 40% are predicted. The differences in radical yields reported may thus be traced to the experimental ONOO <superscript>-</superscript> /CO <subscript>2</subscript> ratios. Given a physiological [CO <subscript>2</subscript> ] of 1.3 mM, the yield of CO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>•-</superscript> and NO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>•</superscript> is 19%, and lower if ONOOCO <subscript>2</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> has a significant reactivity of its own.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1520-5010
Volume :
33
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Chemical research in toxicology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32375475
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00309