Routine uterine culture swab during cesarean section and its clinical correlations: A retrospective comparative study.

Objectives: Cesarean sections, particularly non-elective cesareans, are an important risk factor for the development of postpartum endometritis, a leading cause of postpartum febrile morbidity. We evaluated the yield of obtaining routine intrauterine culture during elective and non-elective cesarean sections, in the prevention and management of postpartum endometritis.
Study Design: A retrospective comparative study investigating the distribution of uterine cultures obtained immediately after fetus and placenta delivery during cesarean sections performed in a single tertiary hospital during 2017. True pathogenic bacteria were included in the study analysis and considered as positive results, while other contaminant bacteria were excluded.
Results: Positive uterine cultures were identified in 10.7 % (88/821) of cesarean sections, with no significant difference in prevalence between elective and non-elective cesareans. Escherichia coli (E.coli), isolated in 40.9 % of the positive cultures of all women, was the most common organism in non-elective cesareans vs. Group B Streptococcus (GBS) in elective cesareans. Higher rate of positive cultures was found in term vs. preterm cesareans (17.5 % vs 10.5 %, respectively, p-value = 0.04). E.coli was the most frequent pathogen reported in both women with intact membranes or premature rupture of membranes (46.3 % and 47.3 % respectively). Eight women (9.1 %) with positive cultures presented with postpartum fever; all had undergone non-elective cesarean section. In one-third of these cases the empirical antibiotic treatment was adjusted according to the uterine culture results and susceptibility testing results.
Conclusions: Obtaining routine intrauterine cultures during non-elective cesarean sections might be useful for detecting significant pathogens and tailoring the antibiotic treatment in postpartum endometritis.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors report any conflict of interest.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)