Comparison of dimethylated and methylchlorinated amylose stationary phases, coated and covalently immobilized on silica, for the separation of some chiral compounds in supercritical fluid chromatography.

The chromatographic properties of a new coated amylose tris(3-chloro-5-methylphenylcarbamate) were evaluated in supercritical fluid chromatography for the separation of enantiomers of chiral 1-aryl-5-aryl-pyrrolidin-2-one derivatives, potential anticancer agents, and some commercial drugs. The mobile phase consisted of CO ₂ -modifier mixtures with 30% of either methanol or ethanol, the flow rate was 3 mL/min. The column oven temperature was 40 °C and the outlet pressure was 15 MPa, in order to limit the compressibility of the CO ₂ , thus limiting density variation along the column. The obtained results were then compared to those observed toward 3 other stationary phases: the coated amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate), the immobilized amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate) and the coated amylose tris(5-chloro-2-methylphenylcarbamate). It was shown that the new coated amylose tris(3-chloro-5-methylphenylcarbamate) was the most retentive column whatever the studied compounds, particularly for thalidomide and omeprazole with retention factors up to 73.3 and 29.5for the second enantiomer, respectively. Concerning the enantioselectivity, even most of the compounds are separated on all the four columns, the coated amylose tris(3-chloro-5-methylphenylcarbamate) allows the best resolution for most of the ten studied analytes (except omeprazole for which the resolution values are equal to 7.8 and 9.7 on the coated amylose tris(3-chloro-5-methylphenylcarbamate) and amylose tris(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbamate), respectively). Acting in complementary ways, the two chlorinated stationary phases permitted the complete separation of enantiomers of nine compounds out of the ten.
Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
(Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)