Back to Search
Start Over
Improved survival with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in chronic limb-threatening ischemia.
- Source :
-
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2020 Dec; Vol. 72 (6), pp. 2130-2138. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Apr 08. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Objective: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease. However, their effect on limb-specific outcomes is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of ACE inhibitors/ARBs on limb salvage (LS) and survival in patients undergoing peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).<br />Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative registry was used to identify patients undergoing PVI for CLTI between April 1, 2010, and June 1, 2017. Patients with complete comorbidity, procedural, and follow-up limb and survival data were included. Propensity score matching was performed to control for baseline differences between the groups. LS, amputation-free survival (AFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated in matched samples using Kaplan-Meier analysis.<br />Results: A total of 12,433 limbs (11,331 patients) were included. The ACE inhibitors/ARBs group of patients had significantly higher prevalence of coronary artery disease (31% vs 27%; P < .001), diabetes (67% vs 57%; P < .001), and hypertension (94% vs 84%; P < .001) and lower incidence of end-stage renal disease (7% vs 12%; P < .001). Indication for intervention was tissue loss in 64% of the ACE inhibitors/ARBs group vs 66% in the no ACE inhibitors/ARBs group (P = .005). Postmatching survival analysis at 5 years showed improved OS (81.8% vs 79.9%; P = .01) and AFS (73% vs 71.5%; P = .04) with ACE inhibitors/ARBs but no difference in LS (ACE inhibitors/ARBs, 88.3%; no ACE inhibitors/ARBs, 88.1%; P = .56). After adjustment for multiple variables in a Cox regression model, ACE inhibitors/ARBs were associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.99; P = .03) and AFS (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.99; P = .04).<br />Conclusions: ACE inhibitors/ARBs are independently associated with improved survival and AFS in patients undergoing PVI for CLTI. LS rates remained unaffected. Further research is required to investigate the use of ACE inhibitors/ARBs in this population of patients, especially CLTI patients with other indications for therapy with ACE inhibitors/ARBs.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Amputation, Surgical
Comorbidity
Female
Humans
Ischemia diagnosis
Ischemia mortality
Limb Salvage
Male
Peripheral Arterial Disease diagnosis
Peripheral Arterial Disease mortality
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States epidemiology
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors therapeutic use
Endovascular Procedures adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures mortality
Ischemia therapy
Peripheral Arterial Disease therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6809
- Volume :
- 72
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32276021
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.041