Back to Search
Start Over
Association of upper extremity and neck access with stroke in endovascular aortic repair.
- Source :
-
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2020 Nov; Vol. 72 (5), pp. 1602-1609. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Apr 06. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Objective: Upper extremity and neck access is commonly used for complex endovascular aortic repairs. We sought to compare perioperative stroke and other complications of (1) arm/neck (AN) and femoral or iliac access versus femoral/iliac (FI) access alone, (2) right- versus left-sided AN, and (3) specific arm versus neck access sites.<br />Methods: Patients entered in the thoracic endovascular aortic repair/complex endovascular aortic repair registry in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2009 to 2018 were analyzed. Patients with a missing access variable and aortic arch proximal landing zone were excluded. The primary outcome was perioperative in-hospital stroke. Secondary outcomes were other postoperative complications and 1-year survival. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used for survival analysis.<br />Results: Of 11,621 patients with 11,774 recorded operations, 6691 operations in 6602 patients met criteria for analysis (1418 AN, 5273 FI). AN patients had a higher rate of smoking history (83.6% vs 76.1%; P < .0001), and prior stroke (12.6% vs 10.1%; P = .01). Operative time (280 ± 124 minutes vs 157 ± 102 minutes; P < .0001), contrast load (141 ± 82 mL vs 103 ± 67 mL; P < .0001), and estimated blood loss (300 mL vs 100 mL; P < .0001) were larger in the AN group, indicative of greater complexity cases. Overall, AN had a higher rate of stroke (3.1% vs 1.8%; P = .003) compared with FI and on multivariable analysis AN access was found to be an independent risk factor for stroke (odds ratio, 1.97; P = .0003). There was no difference in stroke when comparing right- and left-sided AN access (2.8% vs 3.2%; P = .71). Stroke rates were similar between arm, axillary, and multiple access sites, but were significantly higher in patients with carotid access (2.6% vs 3.5% vs 13% vs 3.7%; P = .04). AN also had higher rates of puncture site hematoma, access site occlusion, arm ischemia, and in-hospital mortality (7.1% vs 4.2%; P < .0001). At 1 year, AN had a lower survival rate (85.1% vs 88.1%; P = .03).<br />Conclusions: Upper extremity and neck access for complex aortic repairs has a higher risk of stroke compared with femoral and iliac access alone. Right-sided access does not have a higher stroke rate than left-sided access. Carotid access has a higher stroke rate than axillary, arm, and multiple arm/neck access sites.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Aneurysm mortality
Blood Loss, Surgical statistics & numerical data
Endovascular Procedures methods
Female
Femoral Artery surgery
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Iliac Artery surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Neck surgery
Odds Ratio
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications etiology
Registries statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Stroke etiology
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Upper Extremity surgery
Aortic Aneurysm surgery
Endovascular Procedures adverse effects
Neck blood supply
Postoperative Complications epidemiology
Stroke epidemiology
Upper Extremity blood supply
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6809
- Volume :
- 72
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32273227
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.017