Back to Search Start Over

Evidence based treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip in children under 6 months of age. Systematic review and exploratory analysis.

Authors :
Ashoor M
Abdulla N
Elgabaly EA
Aldlyami E
Alshryda S
Source :
The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland [Surgeon] 2021 Apr; Vol. 19 (2), pp. 77-86. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Apr 03.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Introduction: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common paediatric orthopaedic condition that attracts a substantive amount of controversy. The treatments vary because of the wide spectrum of the condition and the age of children at presentation. Although conservative and surgical treatments exist; it is widely accepted that conservative treatment is the first line of treatment in the first 6 months of life. Several devices have been proposed as the treatment of choice; however, to the best of our knowledge these have not been critically appraised. Therefore, we conducted this review.<br />Methods: A modified Cochrane method was followed with a preplanned detailed research protocol that was developed to guide all aspects of the review. Treatment failure of the devices was chosen as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included femoral nerve palsy (FNP), avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN), residual dysplasia, skin problems, failure of subsequent surgical treatment, compliance and tolerance issues. Results are reported according to the PRISMA guidelines.<br />Results: A total of 30 studies were included in the review comparing 5 devices (The Pavlik harness, the Von Rosen splint, the Tubingen brace, the Frejka pillow, and the Aberdeen splint). The devices were compared in terms of success rate, AVN rate and residual dysplasia. The von Rosen splint has been shown to be superior to other devices in term of success rates and residual dysplasia (Χ <superscript>2</superscript> : P < 0.05).<br />Conclusion: The review findings should be interpreted with caution as there are substantive flaws in the literature and a randomized control trail is warranted to confirm the best device to treat DDH. This is feasible given the magnitude of the problem, the clear diagnostic criteria and the treatment options.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1479-666X
Volume :
19
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32249037
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.02.006