Back to Search Start Over

Machine learning analysis of motor evoked potential time series to predict disability progression in multiple sclerosis.

Authors :
Yperman J
Becker T
Valkenborg D
Popescu V
Hellings N
Wijmeersch BV
Peeters LM
Source :
BMC neurology [BMC Neurol] 2020 Mar 21; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 105. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Mar 21.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Evoked potentials (EPs) are a measure of the conductivity of the central nervous system. They are used to monitor disease progression of multiple sclerosis patients. Previous studies only extracted a few variables from the EPs, which are often further condensed into a single variable: the EP score. We perform a machine learning analysis of motor EP that uses the whole time series, instead of a few variables, to predict disability progression after two years. Obtaining realistic performance estimates of this task has been difficult because of small data set sizes. We recently extracted a dataset of EPs from the Rehabiliation & MS Center in Overpelt, Belgium. Our data set is large enough to obtain, for the first time, a performance estimate on an independent test set containing different patients.<br />Methods: We extracted a large number of time series features from the motor EPs with the highly comparative time series analysis software package. Mutual information with the target and the Boruta method are used to find features which contain information not included in the features studied in the literature. We use random forests (RF) and logistic regression (LR) classifiers to predict disability progression after two years. Statistical significance of the performance increase when adding extra features is checked.<br />Results: Including extra time series features in motor EPs leads to a statistically significant improvement compared to using only the known features, although the effect is limited in magnitude (ΔAUC = 0.02 for RF and ΔAUC = 0.05 for LR). RF with extra time series features obtains the best performance (AUC = 0.75±0.07 (mean and standard deviation)), which is good considering the limited number of biomarkers in the model. RF (a nonlinear classifier) outperforms LR (a linear classifier).<br />Conclusions: Using machine learning methods on EPs shows promising predictive performance. Using additional EP time series features beyond those already in use leads to a modest increase in performance. Larger datasets, preferably multi-center, are needed for further research. Given a large enough dataset, these models may be used to support clinicians in their decision making process regarding future treatment.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2377
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32199461
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01672-w