Back to Search
Start Over
Respiratory mechanics evaluation of mice submitted to intravenous methacholine: Bolus vs. continuous infusion.
- Source :
-
Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) [Exp Biol Med (Maywood)] 2020 Apr; Vol. 245 (8), pp. 680-689. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Mar 17. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Impact Statement: Respiratory mechanics studies are associated with fundamental research and translational studies; the present work thus investigates this particular matter. Our current research describes differences and similarities between two different ways of administrating a very prevalent bronchoconstrictor (methacholine) in an aging process scenario. The core issue of our work is related with troubles we find with the bolus protocol and the application of the mathematical model used to assess the respiratory mechanics. Our findings reveal the continuous infusion as an alternative to these problems and we hope to provide the proper foundations to a more reliable assessment in the respiratory field.
- Subjects :
- Animals
Bronchoconstrictor Agents administration & dosage
Infusions, Intravenous methods
Infusions, Intravenous standards
Methacholine Chloride administration & dosage
Mice
Models, Theoretical
Respiratory System drug effects
Respiratory System growth & development
Bronchoconstrictor Agents pharmacology
Methacholine Chloride pharmacology
Respiratory Mechanics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1535-3699
- Volume :
- 245
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32183551
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370220912393