Back to Search
Start Over
Extending cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk (D+/R-) lung transplant recipients from 6 to 9 months reduces cytomegalovirus disease: A retrospective study.
- Source :
-
Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society [Transpl Infect Dis] 2020 Aug; Vol. 22 (4), pp. e13277. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Mar 27. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Rationale: Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients receiving a seropositive allograft (D+/R-) are at a high risk of developing CMV disease. Our program increased the duration of CMV prophylaxis from 6 to 9 months in May 2013. Here, we present the impact on the incidence of CMV infection, disease, side effects, rejection, and other factors.<br />Methods: Retrospective cohort of 241 CMV (D+/R-) patients transplanted between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. Blood CMV testing was done according to protocol. All patients received ganciclovir/valganciclovir as prophylaxis. We compared the incidence and timing of CMV infection and disease up to 6 months after cessation of prophylaxis between patients who received 9 months (May 2013 onwards) and a historical control group who received 6 months of prophylaxis (prior to May 2013). CMV infection was defined as detectable CMV viremia in the absence of symptoms. CMV disease was defined as CMV syndrome or tissue-invasive disease. Side effects of prophylaxis and CMV resistance were recorded.<br />Results: A total of 116 patients were included in the 6-month group and 125 in the 9-month group. The extended 9-month CMV prophylaxis delayed the onset of CMV infection (median time to CMV infection after lung transplantation 295 vs 353 days, P < .01) but did not significantly reduce the incidence of CMV infection (65% vs 64%, P = .06, log-rank). The 9-month prophylaxis delayed the onset and decreased the incidence of CMV disease from 50% in the 6-month group to 42% (P = .02 log-rank). There was no difference in the rate of adverse effects (leukopenia in 32% in both groups, P = .53) or development of CMV resistance between the two groups (4 cases in both groups, P = .92). There were no significant differences in overall survival or the rate of chronic lung allograft dysfunction between the groups.<br />Conclusions: Extending duration of CMV prophylaxis from 6 to 9 months resulted in a delayed and decreased incidence of CMV disease in our lung transplant population. The absolute risk reduction achieved by extended CMV prophylaxis was 8%. The incidence of CMV infection, and ganciclovir resistance and side effects were similar between the two groups. Our results suggest that extending CMV prophylaxis in the highest risk CMV D+/R- group is effective in reducing CMV disease.<br /> (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Antiviral Agents therapeutic use
Female
Ganciclovir administration & dosage
Ganciclovir therapeutic use
Graft Rejection prevention & control
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Transplantation, Homologous
Valganciclovir administration & dosage
Valganciclovir therapeutic use
Antiviral Agents administration & dosage
Cytomegalovirus Infections prevention & control
Drug Administration Schedule
Lung Transplantation adverse effects
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis methods
Transplant Recipients
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1399-3062
- Volume :
- 22
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32170813
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.13277