Back to Search
Start Over
Phase IIIb Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous NEPA for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Initial and Repeat Cycles of Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide (AC) Chemotherapy.
- Source :
-
The oncologist [Oncologist] 2020 Mar; Vol. 25 (3), pp. e589-e597. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 08. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: NEPA, a combination antiemetic of a neurokinin-1 (NK <subscript>1</subscript> ) receptor antagonist (RA) (netupitant [oral]/fosnetupitant [intravenous; IV]) and 5-HT <subscript>3</subscript> RA, palonosetron] offers 5-day CINV prevention with a single dose. Fosnetupitant solution contains no allergenic excipients, surfactant, emulsifier, or solubility enhancer. A phase III study of patients receiving cisplatin found no infusion-site or anaphylactic reactions related to IV NEPA. However, hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis have been reported with other IV NK <subscript>1</subscript> RAs, particularly fosaprepitant in patients receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of IV NEPA in the AC setting.<br />Materials and Methods: This phase IIIb, multinational, randomized, double-blind study enrolled females with breast cancer naive to highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive a single 30-minute infusion of IV NEPA or single oral NEPA capsule on day 1 prior to AC, in repeated (up to 4) cycles. Oral dexamethasone was given to all patients on day 1 only.<br />Results: A total of 402 patients were included. The adverse event (AE) profiles were similar for IV and oral NEPA and consistent with those expected. Most AEs were mild or moderate with a similarly low incidence of treatment-related AEs in both groups. There were no treatment-related injection-site AEs and no reports of hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis. The efficacy of IV and oral NEPA were similar, with high complete response (no emesis/no rescue) rates observed in cycle 1 (overall [0-120 hours] 73.0% IV NEPA, 77.3% oral NEPA) and maintained over subsequent cycles.<br />Conclusion: IV NEPA was highly effective and safe with no associated hypersensitivity and injection-site reactions in patients receiving AC.<br />Implications for Practice: As a combination of a neurokinin-1 (NK <subscript>1</subscript> ) receptor antagonist (RA) and 5-HT <subscript>3</subscript> RA, NEPA offers 5-day chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prevention with a single dose and an opportunity to improve adherence to antiemetic guidelines. In this randomized multinational phase IIIb study, intravenous (IV) NEPA (fosnetupitant/palonosetron) was safe and highly effective in patients receiving multiple cycles of anthracycline-cyclophosphamide (AC)-based chemotherapy. Unlike other IV NK <subscript>1</subscript> RAs, the IV NEPA combination solution does not require any surfactant, emulsifier, or solubility enhancer and contains no allergenic excipients. Hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis have been reported with other IV NK <subscript>1</subscript> RAs, most commonly with fosaprepitant in the AC setting. Importantly, there were no injection-site or hypersensitivity reactions associated with IV NEPA.<br /> (© 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)
- Subjects :
- Anthracyclines adverse effects
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic therapeutic use
Cyclophosphamide adverse effects
Female
Humans
Nausea chemically induced
Nausea drug therapy
Nausea prevention & control
Quinuclidines therapeutic use
Vomiting chemically induced
Vomiting drug therapy
Antiemetics adverse effects
Breast Neoplasms drug therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1549-490X
- Volume :
- 25
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The oncologist
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32162813
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0527