Back to Search
Start Over
Association of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure with mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes.
- Source :
-
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions [Catheter Cardiovasc Interv] 2020 Oct 01; Vol. 96 (4), pp. E439-E446. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Mar 06. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Objectives: This study sought to investigate the relation between left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS).<br />Background: Risk stratification in ACS patients is important. Data on the role of LVEDP in the prognostication of ACS patients are scarce.<br />Methods: A total of 1,410 patients undergoing PCI for ACS and with available data on LVEDP were divided according to LVEDP tertiles (lowest tertile: ≤13 mmHg, intermediate tertile: 14-20 mmHg, and highest tertile: >20 mmHg). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 246 [28-848] days.<br />Results: Median LVEDP was 16 (11-22) mmHg. All-cause mortality was 2.8%, 4.5%, and 15.0% in the lowest, the intermediate, and the highest LVEDP tertile groups (p < .001), respectively. Belonging to the highest LVEDP tertile was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.30, 5.47], p = .008). By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value for predicting all-cause mortality was 20 mmHg (sensitivity 68.3%, specificity 72.5%). There was no differential effect of LVEDP on mortality in patients with and without LV dysfunction (interaction p = .23) or ST-elevation myocardial infarction as index ACS event (interaction p = .86).<br />Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCI for ACS, LVEDP was independently related with mortality. Hence, LVEDP should be incorporated into early risk stratification and clinical decision making of ACS patients.<br /> (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
- Subjects :
- Acute Coronary Syndrome diagnostic imaging
Acute Coronary Syndrome mortality
Acute Coronary Syndrome physiopathology
Aged
Diastole
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction diagnostic imaging
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction mortality
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction physiopathology
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction diagnostic imaging
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction mortality
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction physiopathology
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Acute Coronary Syndrome therapy
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction therapy
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention mortality
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction therapy
Ventricular Function, Left
Ventricular Pressure
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1522-726X
- Volume :
- 96
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 32141669
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28839