Back to Search Start Over

Prior Balloon Valvuloplasty Versus Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the DIRECTAVI Trial.

Authors :
Leclercq F
Robert P
Akodad M
Macia JC
Gandet T
Delseny D
Chettouh M
Schmutz L
Robert G
Levy G
Targosz F
Maupas E
Roubille F
Marin G
Nagot N
Albat B
Lattuca B
Cayla G
Source :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2020 Mar 09; Vol. 13 (5), pp. 594-602.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate device success of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using new-generation balloon-expandable prostheses with or without balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV).<br />Background: Randomized studies are lacking comparing TAVR without BAV against the conventional technique of TAVR with BAV.<br />Methods: DIRECTAVI (Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) was an open-label noninferiority study that randomized patients undergoing TAVR using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve with or without prior balloon valvuloplasty. The primary endpoint was the device success rate according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria, which was evaluated using a 7% noninferiority margin. The secondary endpoint included procedural and 30-day adverse events.<br />Results: Device success was recorded for 184 of 236 included patients (78.0%). The rate of device success in the direct implantation group (n = 97 [80.2%]) was noninferior to that in the BAV group (n = 87 [75.7%]) (mean difference 4.5%; 95% confidence interval: -4.4% to 13.4%; p = 0.02 for noninferiority). No severe prosthesis-patient mismatch or severe aortic regurgitation occurred in any group. In the direct implantation group, 7 patients (5.8%) required BAV to cross the valve. Adverse events were related mainly to pacemaker implantation (20.9% in the BAV group vs. 19.0% in the direct implantation group; p = 0.70). No significant difference was found between the 2 strategies in duration of procedure, contrast volume, radiation exposure, or rate of post-dilatation.<br />Conclusions: Direct TAVR without prior BAV was noninferior to the conventional strategy using BAV with new-generation balloon-expandable valves, but without procedural simplification. BAV was needed to cross the valve in a few patients, suggesting a need for upstream selection on the basis of patient anatomy. (TAVI Without Balloon Predilatation [of the Aortic Valve] SAPIEN 3 [DIRECTAVI]; NCT02729519).<br /> (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1876-7605
Volume :
13
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32139216
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.12.006