Back to Search Start Over

Prognostic value of a three-scale grading system based on combining molecular imaging with 68 Ga-DOTATATE and 18 F-FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias.

Authors :
Karfis I
Marin G
Levillain H
Drisis S
Muteganya R
Critchi G
Taraji-Schiltz L
Guix CA
Shaza L
Elbachiri M
Mans L
Machiels G
Hendlisz A
Flamen P
Source :
Oncotarget [Oncotarget] 2020 Feb 11; Vol. 11 (6), pp. 589-599. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 11 (Print Publication: 2020).
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

We investigated on the added prognostic value of a three-scale combined molecular imaging with <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE and <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT, (compared to Ki-67 based histological grading), in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia patients. 85 patients with histologically proven metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias, who underwent combined PET/CT imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Highest Ki-67 value available at time of <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT was recorded. Patients were classified according to World Health Organization/European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society histological grades (G1, G2, G3) and into three distinct imaging categories (C1: all lesions are <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG negative/ <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE positive, C2: patients with one or more <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG positive lesions, all of them <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE positive, C3: patients with one or more <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG positive lesions, at least one of them <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE negative). The primary endpoint of the study was Progression-Free Survival, assessed from the date of <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT to the date of radiological progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1. Classification according to histological grade did not show significant statistical difference in median Progression-Free Survival between G1 and G2 but was significant between G2 and G3 patients. In contrast, median Progression-Free Survival was significantly higher in C1 compared to C2 and in C2 compared to C3 patients, revealing three distinctive imaging categories, each with highly distinctive prognosis. Our three-scale combined <superscript>68</superscript> Ga-DOTATATE/ <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET imaging classification holds high prognostic value in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias.<br />Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST All authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.<br /> (Copyright: © 2020 Karfis et al.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1949-2553
Volume :
11
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Oncotarget
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32110279
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27460