Back to Search Start Over

Short fusion with vertebrectomy during growth in congenital spinal deformity: is early surgical intervention recommended?

Authors :
Matsumoto H
Kawakami N
Saito T
Uno K
Suzuki T
Watanabe K
Matsumoto M
Yamaguchi T
Yanagida H
Kotani T
Demura S
Takeshita K
Taniguchi Y
Source :
Spine deformity [Spine Deform] 2020 Aug; Vol. 8 (4), pp. 733-742. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 27.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Study Design: This was a multi-center retrospective cohort study included consecutive pediatric patients who were admitted to 8 institutions for the treatment of congenital spinal deformity from 1991 to 2012.<br />Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare curve corrections and balances, reoperations, and complications at 2-year follow-up between those treated early vs. late. Although early intervention has been recommended, no empirical study has examined the optimal timing of short fusion among patients with congenital spinal deformity.<br />Methods: Patients with congenital spinal deformity with formation failure undergoing vertebrectomy with short fusion (≤ 6 fusion segments) were categorized as early (surgery at ≤ 6 years) and late (7-18 years) fusion. Outcomes included coronal and sagittal curve corrections at immediate and 2-year evaluations; loss of curve correction from immediate to 2-year follow-up; coronal and sagittal balance at 2 years; and inter-operative, major and minor short-term postoperative, and long-term postoperative complications and reoperations.<br />Results: Early fusion (N = 79) compared to late fusion (N = 96) was associated with greater percent curve correction at immediate (71% vs. 60%, p = 0.0046) and 2-year (63% vs. 52%, p = 0.0153) evaluations adjusting for surgeon experience and preoperative coronal balance. These associations were significant for males and those with 3-level fusions but not 4 to 6-level fusions. Early fusion compared with late fusion had more intraoperative (6% vs. 1%) and postoperative long-term complications (27% vs. 18%), as well as unplanned reoperations (13% vs. 9%). Early vs. late fusion had fewer short-term complications, both major (6% vs. 15%) and minor (6% vs. 15%).<br />Conclusions: Patients who underwent early treatment achieved larger major curve correction by 10% compared to patients with late treatment when assessed at 2-year postoperative evaluation. However, early fusion should be considered with careful attention to possible increased risk of reoperations.<br />Level of Evidence: Level III.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2212-1358
Volume :
8
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Spine deformity
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32109312
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00082-9