Back to Search Start Over

External validation of the Martini nomogram for prediction of side-specific extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors :
Soeterik TFW
van Melick HHE
Dijksman LM
Küsters-Vandevelde HVN
Biesma DH
Witjes JA
van Basten JA
Source :
Urologic oncology [Urol Oncol] 2020 May; Vol. 38 (5), pp. 372-378. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 19.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Introduction: To establish oncological safe nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, accurate assessment of extraprostatic extension (EPE) is critical. A recently developed nomogram including magnetic resonance imaging parameters accurately predicted side-specific EPE in the development cohort. The aim of this study is to assess this model's performance in an external patient population.<br />Patients and Methods: Model fit was assessed in a cohort of 550 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2014 to 2017 for prostate cancer. Model calibration was evaluated using calibration slopes. Discriminative ability was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Model updating was done by adjusting the linear predictor to minimize differences in expected and observed risk for EPE.<br />Results: A total of 792 prostate lobes were included for model validation. Discriminative ability expressed in terms of receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.78, 95%CI 0.75-0.82. Graphical evaluation of the calibration showed poor fit with a high disagreement between predicted probabilities and observed probabilities of EPE in the population. Model updating resulted in excellent agreement between mean predicted and observed probabilities. However, calibration plots showed substantial miscalibration; including both under- and overestimation.<br />Conclusion: External validation of the novel nomogram for the prediction of side specific EPE developed by Martini and co-workers showed good discriminative ability but poor calibration. After updating, substantial miscalibration was still present. Use of this nomogram for individualized risk predictions is therefore not recommended.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-2496
Volume :
38
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Urologic oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32088104
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.12.028