Long-term outcomes after second-generation cryoballoon ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - Feasibility of a single short freeze strategy without bonus applications.

Background: A paucity of data exists about long-term outcomes after second-generation cryoballoon ablation (2nd-CBA), and the feasibility of short freeze strategies remains under debate. We assessed the long-term follow-up outcomes.
Methods: This study included 186 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) patients (62 ± 11 years, 136 men) who underwent 2nd-CBAs with a 28-mm balloon and single 3-min freeze strategy without bonus applications. Fourteen-day consecutive monitoring was performed to detect early AF recurrences (ERAFs).
Results: Overall, 713/736(96.9%) PVs were isolated with CBs. The total number of applications/patient was 5.3 ± 1.5. The total procedure and fluoroscopic times were 79.9 ± 28.1 and 24.4 ± 14.2 min. Asymptomatic right phrenic nerve injury occurred in 11 patients, however, all recovered during the follow-up. A total of 76(41.7%) patients experienced ERAFs. During a median 45.0 [30.0-51.0] month follow-up, the single procedure AF freedom was 76.1, 73.5, 70.5, and 63.7% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. At a median of 7.0 [4.0-12.0] months after the initial procedure, 35 (18.8%) patients underwent second procedures, and 106/137 (77.4%) PVs were still isolated. The multiple procedure AF freedom was 91.7, 89.3, 86.8, and 81.3% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. A Cox's proportional hazards model determined that the presence of ERAF was associated with a greater risk of recurrence after the last procedure (Hazard ratio = 2.830; 95% confidence interval = 1.173-6.833; p = 0.021). The percentage of continuation of anticoagulation therapy after the initial procedure was 33.1, 23.5, 21.7, and 21.7% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively.
Conclusions: Our long-term follow-up data demonstrated the feasibility of a single short freeze strategy in PAF patients.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Miyazaki has received consulting fees and speaker honoraria from Medtronic and belongs to the endowed departments of Medtronic, Boston, Abbott, and Japan Lifeline. The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
(Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)