Back to Search Start Over

Re-irradiation for recurrent rectal cancer - a single-center experience.

Authors :
Al-Haidari G
Skovlund E
Undseth C
Rekstad BL
Larsen SG
Åsli LM
Dueland S
Malinen E
Guren MG
Source :
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) [Acta Oncol] 2020 May; Vol. 59 (5), pp. 534-540. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 14.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: There is no clear consensus on the use of re-irradiation (reRT) in the management of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). The aim of the present study was to investigate all reRT administered for rectal cancer at a large referral institution and to evaluate patient outcomes and toxicity. Material and methods: All patients with rectal cancer were identified who had received previous pelvic radiotherapy (RT) and underwent reRT during 2006-2016. Medical records and RT details of the primary tumor treatments and rectal cancer recurrence treatments were registered, including details on reRT, chemotherapy, surgery, adverse events, and long-term outcomes. Results: Of 77 patients who received ReRT, 67 had previously received pelvic RT for rectal cancer and were administered reRT for LRRC. Re-irradiation doses were 30.0-45.0 Gy, most often given as hyperfractionated RT in 1.2-1.5 Gy fractions twice daily with concomitant capecitabine. The median time since initial RT was 29 months (range, 13-174 months). Of 36 patients considered as potentially resectable, 20 underwent surgery for LRRC within 3 months after reRT. Operated patients had better 3-year overall survival (OS) (62%) compared to those who were not operated (16%; HR 0.32, p  = .001). The median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 107 cm <superscript>3</superscript> , and 3-year OS was significantly better in patients with GTV <107 cm <superscript>3</superscript> (44%) compared to patients with GTV ≥107 cm <superscript>3</superscript> (21%; HR 0.52, p  = .03). Conclusion: Three-year survival was significantly better for patients who underwent surgery after reRT or who had small tumor volume. Prospective clinical trials are recommended for further improvements in patient selection, outcomes, and toxicity assessment.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1651-226X
Volume :
59
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32056476
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1725111