Back to Search Start Over

Responses of Conversational Agents to Health and Lifestyle Prompts: Investigation of Appropriateness and Presentation Structures.

Authors :
Kocaballi AB
Quiroz JC
Rezazadegan D
Berkovsky S
Magrabi F
Coiera E
Laranjo L
Source :
Journal of medical Internet research [J Med Internet Res] 2020 Feb 09; Vol. 22 (2), pp. e15823. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Feb 09.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Conversational agents (CAs) are systems that mimic human conversations using text or spoken language. Their widely used examples include voice-activated systems such as Apple Siri, Google Assistant, Amazon Alexa, and Microsoft Cortana. The use of CAs in health care has been on the rise, but concerns about their potential safety risks often remain understudied.<br />Objective: This study aimed to analyze how commonly available, general-purpose CAs on smartphones and smart speakers respond to health and lifestyle prompts (questions and open-ended statements) by examining their responses in terms of content and structure alike.<br />Methods: We followed a piloted script to present health- and lifestyle-related prompts to 8 CAs. The CAs' responses were assessed for their appropriateness on the basis of the prompt type: responses to safety-critical prompts were deemed appropriate if they included a referral to a health professional or service, whereas responses to lifestyle prompts were deemed appropriate if they provided relevant information to address the problem prompted. The response structure was also examined according to information sources (Web search-based or precoded), response content style (informative and/or directive), confirmation of prompt recognition, and empathy.<br />Results: The 8 studied CAs provided in total 240 responses to 30 prompts. They collectively responded appropriately to 41% (46/112) of the safety-critical and 39% (37/96) of the lifestyle prompts. The ratio of appropriate responses deteriorated when safety-critical prompts were rephrased or when the agent used a voice-only interface. The appropriate responses included mostly directive content and empathy statements for the safety-critical prompts and a mix of informative and directive content for the lifestyle prompts.<br />Conclusions: Our results suggest that the commonly available, general-purpose CAs on smartphones and smart speakers with unconstrained natural language interfaces are limited in their ability to advise on both the safety-critical health prompts and lifestyle prompts. Our study also identified some response structures the CAs employed to present their appropriate responses. Further investigation is needed to establish guidelines for designing suitable response structures for different prompt types.<br /> (©Ahmet Baki Baki Kocaballi, Juan C Quiroz, Dana Rezazadegan, Shlomo Berkovsky, Farah Magrabi, Enrico Coiera, Liliana Laranjo. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 06.02.2020.)

Subjects

Subjects :
Humans
Communication
Life Style

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1438-8871
Volume :
22
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of medical Internet research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
32039810
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2196/15823