Patient perceptions of a tuberculosis testing program provided in the community pharmacy setting.

Objectives: This study sought to describe patient experiences and perceptions of a public health initiative designed to improve tuberculosis (TB) testing access using the tuberculin skin test (TST) in a community pharmacy setting.
Study Design: This was a cross-sectional study.
Methods: A telephonic survey of patients who had received a TST at one of twelve participating community pharmacies between August 2014 and July 2016 was conducted. The 26-question survey was developed by two pharmacists with expertise in TB management and one pharmacy student. Before administration the survey was peer-reviewed for clarity. Potential study patients were identified through TST records at the study pharmacies. English-speaking patients older than 18 years were eligible for study inclusion. Statistical differences in responses based on location were identified using chi-squared test for frequency comparisons with a P-value of <0.05 to determine statistical significance.
Results: A total of 1709 patients received a TST during the study period, of whom 431 were contacted and 325 participated, meeting the predetermined representative sample needed of 314 patients. The majority of study patients were female (67.1%) and white (81%). The mean age was 36 years (standard deviation = 14.1). A majority (68.3%) lived <5 miles from the TST pharmacy, while 45.2% of those with a primary care provider (PCP) (61.6% of respondents) lived within 5 miles of the PCP's office. Care was accessible and met patients' testing needs. For most patients (84.6%), the initial and follow-up appointments took < 20 min. Follow-up TST reading rate was 98.5%; 4.3% of tests were positive. Positive TST results were associated with use of a small city pharmacy (P = 0.003). Perception differences based on location were identified.
Conclusions: Uptake of the TST service in the community pharmacy setting was high and patients reported positive experiences.
(Copyright © 2019 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)