Back to Search Start Over

Validation of deep-learning image reconstruction for coronary computed tomography angiography: Impact on noise, image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors :
Benz DC
Benetos G
Rampidis G
von Felten E
Bakula A
Sustar A
Kudura K
Messerli M
Fuchs TA
Gebhard C
Pazhenkottil AP
Kaufmann PA
Buechel RR
Source :
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography [J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr] 2020 Sep - Oct; Vol. 14 (5), pp. 444-451. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 13.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Advances in image reconstruction are necessary to decrease radiation exposure from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) further, but iterative reconstruction has been shown to degrade image quality at high levels. Deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) offers unique opportunities to overcome these limitations. The present study compared the impact of DLIR and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) on quantitative and qualitative image parameters and the diagnostic accuracy of CCTA using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the standard of reference.<br />Methods: This retrospective study includes 43 patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA and ICA. Datasets were reconstructed with ASiR-V 70% (using standard [SD] and high-definition [HD] kernels) and with DLIR at different levels (i.e., medium [M] and high [H]). Image noise, image quality, and coronary luminal narrowing were evaluated by three blinded readers. Diagnostic accuracy was compared against ICA.<br />Results: Noise did not significantly differ between ASiR-V SD and DLIR-M (37 vs. 37 HU, p = 1.000), but was significantly lower in DLIR-H (30 HU, p < 0.001) and higher in ASiR-V HD (53 HU, p < 0.001). Image quality was higher for DLIR-M and DLIR-H (3.4-3.8 and 4.2-4.6) compared to ASiR-V SD and HD (2.1-2.7 and 1.8-2.2; p < 0.001), with DLIR-H yielding the highest image quality. Consistently across readers, no significant differences in sensitivity (88% vs. 92%; p = 0.453), specificity (73% vs. 73%; p = 0.583) and diagnostic accuracy (80% vs. 82%; p = 0.366) were found between ASiR-V HD and DLIR-H.<br />Conclusion: DLIR significantly reduces noise in CCTA compared to ASiR-V, while yielding superior image quality at equal diagnostic accuracy.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The University Hospital Zurich holds a research agreement with GE Healthcare.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1876-861X
Volume :
14
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31974008
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2020.01.002