Back to Search Start Over

Does intensive glycaemic control promote healing in diabetic foot ulcers? - a feasibility study.

Authors :
Dissanayake A
Vandal AC
Boyle V
Park D
Milne B
Grech R
Ng A
Source :
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2020 Jan 20; Vol. 10 (1), pp. e029009. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 20.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Introduction: One in four diabetes patients will develop a foot ulcer over their lifetime. The role of glycaemic control in the healing of foot ulcers in diabetes patients is not supported by randomised controlled trial (RCT) data.<br />Objectives: To determine the feasibility of an RCT of glycaemic control with intensive insulin therapy in diabetic foot ulcer, by assessing: entry criteria, fasting capillary blood glucose (FCBG) medication satisfaction and sensitivity of different ulcer-healing endpoints to glycaemic control.<br />Design: Two substudies: one cross-sectional and one single-arm prospective.<br />Setting: Single-centre secondary care diabetic foot clinic in New Zealand.<br />Participants: Substudy 1: 78 participants consisting of all people ≥18 years with a diabetic foot ulcer presenting to the clinic over 35 weeks in 2015.Substudy 2: 15 participants from Substudy 1 consenting to intensive insulin therapy.<br />Intervention: Substudy 1: None.Substudy 2: Intensive insulin therapy with standard podiatry care over 24 weeks.<br />Outcome: Substudy 1: Proportion of participants satisfying potential RCT entry criteria; medication satisfaction (Diabetes Medication Satisfaction).Substudy 2: FCBG, index ulcer healing time, index ulcer size, health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form).<br />Results: Proportion in Substudy 1 satisfying all entry criteria was 31% (95% CI 21 to 42). FCBG values decreased between baseline and study end (difference -3.7 mmol/L, 95% CI -6.5 to -0.8); 83% (95% CI 44 to 95) of ulcers healed by 24 weeks. FCBG correlated negatively with medication satisfaction. Ulcer area logarithm was most sensitive to FCBG changes, displaying significant negative correlation with HRQoL outcomes. Detecting a 30% between-group difference in this outcome (80% power, α=5%) requires 220 participants per arm, achievable within 1 year with 15 centres similar to study setting.<br />Conclusions: An adequately powered RCT requires cooperation between a large number of centres. Ulcer area logarithm should be primary endpoint.<br />Trial Registration Number: ANZCTR ACTRN12617001414303.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-6055
Volume :
10
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31964660
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029009