Back to Search Start Over

Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation by pulmonologist improved diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy.

Authors :
Lin CK
Jan IS
Yu KL
Chang LY
Fan HJ
Wen YF
Ho CC
Source :
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi [J Formos Med Assoc] 2020 Nov; Vol. 119 (11), pp. 1684-1692. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 18.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background/purpose: Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) has been shown to improve the diagnostic accuracy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB). However, ROSE by a cytopathologist or cytotechnologist is not always available during the procedure. The purposes of this study were to verify that a pulmonologist, after receiving training in cytology, could accurately assess an EBUS-TBB specimen on-site, and to evaluate the contribution of ROSE to EBUS-TBB.<br />Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent EBUS-TBB for diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) from January 2014 to June 2017 was performed. PPLs without a malignant diagnosis were excluded. The ROSE result determined by a pulmonologist was compared to the formal imprint cytologic report and pathologic report. The diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBB was also compared between those with and without ROSE.<br />Results: Two hundred ninety-three patients who underwent 336 EBUS-TBB procedures for PPL diagnosis and were found to have proven malignancy were enrolled. Eighty-six procedures were performed with ROSE. With the formal imprint cytologic diagnosis as the standard, ROSE had 96.9% sensitivity, 68.2% specificity, 89.9% positive predictive value (PPV), 88.2% negative predictive value (NPV), and 89.5% diagnostic accuracy. With the formal pathologic result as the standard, ROSE had 88.2% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 97.1% PPV, 47.1% NPV, and 87.2% diagnostic accuracy, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher when ROSE was performed during EBUS-TBB (88.4% vs 68.0%, P < 0.001).<br />Conclusion: A trained pulmonologist can interpret adequately cytologic smears on-site and effectively improve the accuracy of EBUS-TBB in the diagnosis of PPLs.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0929-6646
Volume :
119
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31964550
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2020.01.001