Back to Search Start Over

Clinical interpretation of airway response to a bronchodilator. Epidemiologic considerations.

Authors :
Dales RE
Spitzer WO
Tousignant P
Schechter M
Suissa S
Source :
The American review of respiratory disease [Am Rev Respir Dis] 1988 Aug; Vol. 138 (2), pp. 317-20.
Publication Year :
1988

Abstract

Airways responsiveness to a bronchodilator is frequently measured to assist in determining the cause of respiratory symptoms. Clinically, a greater than 15% improvement in the FEV1 is often used to define the "increased" response indicative of asthma. However, unlike other tests of lung function, reference standards derived from "healthy" members of a general population sample have never been reported. As part of a health survey carried out in Alberta, Canada, 2,609 subjects completed a standardized respiratory symptom questionnaire and had FEV1 measured before and 20 min after inhaling terbutaline sulfate via a 750-ml spacer device. Among asymptomatic never-smoking subjects with a FEV1 greater than 80% of predicted, the upper 95th percentile of bronchodilator response (BDR), when expressed as 100 x (FEV1 postBDR - FEV1 preBDR)/predicted baseline FEV1 averaged 9%. This value remained remarkably stable across gender, age (7 to 75 yr), and height groups, and deviated to 6% only when baseline FEV1 was greater than 120% of predicted. Consistent with other respiratory function variables, in which the upper limit of normal is often defined as the upper 95th percentile, our population-derived reference values provide a conceptual definition of BDR that can easily be applied to define "increased" response in the clinical setting.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0003-0805
Volume :
138
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The American review of respiratory disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
3195831
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/138.2.317