Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical interpretation of airway response to a bronchodilator. Epidemiologic considerations.
- Source :
-
The American review of respiratory disease [Am Rev Respir Dis] 1988 Aug; Vol. 138 (2), pp. 317-20. - Publication Year :
- 1988
-
Abstract
- Airways responsiveness to a bronchodilator is frequently measured to assist in determining the cause of respiratory symptoms. Clinically, a greater than 15% improvement in the FEV1 is often used to define the "increased" response indicative of asthma. However, unlike other tests of lung function, reference standards derived from "healthy" members of a general population sample have never been reported. As part of a health survey carried out in Alberta, Canada, 2,609 subjects completed a standardized respiratory symptom questionnaire and had FEV1 measured before and 20 min after inhaling terbutaline sulfate via a 750-ml spacer device. Among asymptomatic never-smoking subjects with a FEV1 greater than 80% of predicted, the upper 95th percentile of bronchodilator response (BDR), when expressed as 100 x (FEV1 postBDR - FEV1 preBDR)/predicted baseline FEV1 averaged 9%. This value remained remarkably stable across gender, age (7 to 75 yr), and height groups, and deviated to 6% only when baseline FEV1 was greater than 120% of predicted. Consistent with other respiratory function variables, in which the upper limit of normal is often defined as the upper 95th percentile, our population-derived reference values provide a conceptual definition of BDR that can easily be applied to define "increased" response in the clinical setting.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0003-0805
- Volume :
- 138
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The American review of respiratory disease
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 3195831
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/138.2.317