Back to Search Start Over

Cytotoxicity and inflammatory response of different types of provisional restorative materials.

Authors :
Campaner M
Takamiya AS
Bitencourt SB
Mazza LC
de Oliveira SHP
Shibayama R
Barão VAR
Sukotjo C
Pesqueira AA
Source :
Archives of oral biology [Arch Oral Biol] 2020 Mar; Vol. 111, pp. 104643. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 26.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the cytotoxicity and inflammatory response of different types of provisional restorative materials to mice gingival fibroblasts.<br />Methods: Cytotoxicity of provisional material discs (thermal-polymerized acrylic resin; auto-polymerized acrylic resin; bisacrylic resin; nano-ceramic resin for CAD/CAM and prefabricated polymer block for CAD/CAM) to Mice (Balb/c) gingival cell were investigated under direct and indirect contact (extracts) at 24, 48 and 72 h, using the MTT and Alamar blue assays. Materials extracts (24 h) were applied to the cell culture (indirect contact) or cells were seeded on discs of provisional materials, and the cytotoxicity and production of IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α after 24, 48 and 72 h were analyzed through MTT, Alamar Blue® and ELISA. Culture medium was used as control for indirect contact assay (extract) and the surfaces of the wells without discs of provisional materials were used as control for direct contact assay. Results were analysed statistically by ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni-Test correction. Statistically significant differences were considered if P was < .05.<br />Results: Auto-polymerized and bisacrylic resins (direct contact) reduced cell viability after 24, 48 and 72 h compared to control (P < .05). Indirect contact (extract) was not cytotoxic to cells at all periods compared to control (P > .05). Auto-polymerized and bisacrylic resins increased IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α levels mainly at 24 h when compared to the other materials (P < .001).<br />Conclusion: Auto-polymerized and bisacrylic were more cytotoxic to mice gingival fibroblasts. CAD/CAM nano ceramic resin and prefabricated polymer blocks are more predictable materials to preserve the periodontal soft tissues.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Manuscript title “Cytotoxicity and inflammatory response of different types of provisional restorative materials” The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1506
Volume :
111
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Archives of oral biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31918345
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104643