Living Independent From Tobacco reduces cigarette smoking and improves general health status among long-term tobacco users with disabilities.

Background: People with disabilities disproportionately use tobacco and suffer associated negative health consequences. Research is needed to explore tobacco cessation programming for people with disabilities to counter these health disparities.
Objective: We evaluated the impact of Living Independent From Tobacco on tobacco use, knowledge and attitudes about tobacco use, coping skills, and perceived health status among people with disabilities. We also assessed participants' subjective impressions at post-test.
Methods: Living Independent From Tobacco was evaluated via train the trainer model at three Midwestern sites serving people with disabilities. Outcomes were assessed at four time points: pre- and post-test (n = 30), and again at 1-month (n = 26) and 6-months (n = 13).
Results: Long-term tobacco users with disabilities significantly reduced tobacco use from pre-test to post-test (p = 0.003), and, compared to baseline, this reduction continued to be significant 1-month after the intervention (p = 0.02). From pre-test to post-test, perceived health status significantly improved (p = 0.0001). No significant changes were observed across time points for knowledge and attitudes about tobacco use nor for coping skills. Qualitative data revealed the importance of coping skills to mitigate the negative effects of nicotine withdrawal. Peer accountability was also noted as an important source of motivation for tobacco cessation.
Conclusions: Data from the present study provide evidence for the short-term effectiveness of Living Independent From Tobacco to reduce tobacco use and improve health status among people with disabilities. Qualitative data revealed the importance of coping skills and peer accountability to support tobacco cessation. Implications for tobacco cessation programming for people with disabilities are discussed.
Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)