Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network in the differentiation of combined naevi and melanomas.

Authors :
Fink C
Blum A
Buhl T
Mitteldorf C
Hofmann-Wellenhof R
Deinlein T
Stolz W
Trennheuser L
Cussigh C
Deltgen D
Winkler JK
Toberer F
Enk A
Rosenberger A
Haenssle HA
Source :
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV [J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol] 2020 Jun; Vol. 34 (6), pp. 1355-1361. Date of Electronic Publication: 2020 Jan 21.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN) may assist physicians in the diagnosis of melanoma. The capacity of a CNN to differentiate melanomas from combined naevi, the latter representing well-known melanoma simulators, has not been investigated.<br />Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of a CNN when used to differentiate melanomas from combined naevi in comparison with dermatologists.<br />Methods: In this study, a CNN with regulatory approval for the European market (Moleanalyzer-Pro, FotoFinder Systems GmbH, Bad Birnbach, Germany) was used. We attained a dichotomous classification (benign, malignant) in dermoscopic images of 36 combined naevi and 36 melanomas with a mean Breslow thickness of 1.3 mm. Primary outcome measures were the CNN's sensitivity, specificity and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) in comparison with 11 dermatologists with different levels of experience.<br />Results: The CNN revealed a sensitivity, specificity and DOR of 97.1% (95% CI [82.7-99.6]), 78.8% (95% CI [62.8-89.1.3]) and 34 (95% CI [4.8-239]), respectively. Dermatologists showed a lower mean sensitivity, specificity and DOR of 90.6% (95% CI [84.1-94.7]; P = 0.092), 71.0% (95% CI [62.6-78.1]; P = 0.256) and 24 (95% CI [11.6-48.4]; P = 0.1114). Under the assumption that dermatologists use the CNN to verify their (initial) melanoma diagnosis, dermatologists achieve an increased specificity of 90.3% (95% CI [79.8-95.6]) at an almost unchanged sensitivity. The largest benefit was observed in 'beginners', who performed worst without CNN verification (DOR = 12) but best with CNN verification (DOR = 98).<br />Conclusion: The tested CNN more accurately classified combined naevi and melanomas in comparison with trained dermatologists. Their diagnostic performance could be improved if the CNN was used to confirm/overrule an initial melanoma diagnosis. Application of a CNN may therefore be of benefit to clinicians.<br /> (© 2019 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-3083
Volume :
34
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31856342
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16165