Back to Search Start Over

Study of in vitro and in vivo genotoxic effects of air pollution fine (PM 2.5-0.18 ) and quasi-ultrafine (PM 0.18 ) particles on lung models.

Authors :
Platel A
Privat K
Talahari S
Delobel A
Dourdin G
Gateau E
Simar S
Saleh Y
Sotty J
Antherieu S
Canivet L
Alleman LY
Perdrix E
Garçon G
Denayer FO
Lo Guidice JM
Nesslany F
Source :
The Science of the total environment [Sci Total Environ] 2020 Apr 01; Vol. 711, pp. 134666. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 02.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Air pollution and particulate matter (PM) are classified as carcinogenic to humans. Pollutants evidence for public health concern include coarse (PM <subscript>10</subscript> ) and fine (PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> ) particles. However, ultrafine particles (PM <subscript>0.1</subscript> ) are assumed to be more toxic than larger particles, but data are still needed to better understand their mechanism of action. In this context, the aim of our work was to investigate the in vitro and in vivo genotoxic potential of fine (PM <subscript>2.5-018</subscript> ) and quasi ultra-fine (PM <subscript>0.18</subscript> ) particles from an urban-industrial area (Dunkirk, France) by using comet, micronucleus and/or gene mutation assays. In vitro assessment was performed with 2 lung immortalized cell lines (BEAS-2B and NCI-H292) and primary normal human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE) grown at the air-liquid interface or in submerged conditions (5 µg PM/cm <superscript>2</superscript> ). For in vivo assessment, tests were performed after acute (24 h, 100 µg PM/animal), subacute (1 month, 10 µg PM/animal) and subchronic (3 months, 10 µg PM/animal) intranasal exposure of BALB/c mice. In vitro, our results show that PM <subscript>2.5-018</subscript> and PM <subscript>0.18</subscript> induced primary DNA damage but no chromosomal aberrations in immortalized cells. Negative results were noted in primary cells for both endpoints. In vivo assays revealed that PM <subscript>2.5-018</subscript> and PM <subscript>0.18</subscript> induced no significant increases in DNA primary damage, chromosomal aberrations or gene mutations, whatever the duration of exposure. This investigation provides initial answers regarding the in vitro and in vivo genotoxic mode of action of PM <subscript>2.5-018</subscript> and PM <subscript>0.18</subscript> at moderate doses and highlights the need to develop standardized specific methodologies for assessing the genotoxicity of PM. Moreover, other mechanisms possibly implicated in pulmonary carcinogenesis, e.g. epigenetics, should be investigated.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1026
Volume :
711
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Science of the total environment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31812380
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134666