Back to Search Start Over

The QR-max index, a novel electrocardiographic index for the determination of left ventricular conduction delay and selection of cardiac resynchronization in patients with non-left bundle branch block.

Authors :
Pastore G
Maines M
Marcantoni L
Lanza D
Zanon F
Noventa F
Corbucci G
Rigatelli G
Baracca E
Zuin M
Picariello C
Carraro M
Conte L
Roncon L
Barold SS
Source :
Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing [J Interv Card Electrophysiol] 2020 Aug; Vol. 58 (2), pp. 147-156. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Dec 05.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB) remains an uncertain indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Non-LBBB includes right bundle branch block (RBBB) and non-specific LV conduction delay (NSCD), two different electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns which are not generally considered to be associated with LV conduction delay as judged by the invasive assessment of the Q-LV interval. We evaluated whether a novel ECG interval (QR-max index) correlated with the degree of LV conduction delay regardless of the type of non-LBBB ECG pattern, and could, therefore, predict CRT response. In 173 non-LBBB patients on CRT (92 NSCD, 81 RBBB), the QR-max index was measured as the maximum interval from QRS onset to R-wave offset in the limb leads. The correlation between QR-max index and Q-LV interval and the impact of the QR-max index on time to first heart failure hospitalization during 3-year follow-up were assessed. Q-LV correlated better with the QR-max index than with QRSd, particularly in the RBBB group (r = 0.91; p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.19; p < 0.089), while the correlations were r = 0.79 (p < 0.01) and r = 0.68 (p < 0.01), respectively, in the NSCD group. In both groups, the QR-max index was significantly more able than QRSd to identify CRT responders (AUC 0.825 vs. 0.576; p = 0.0008 in RBBB; AUC 0.738 vs. 0.701; p = 0.459 in NSCD). A QR-max index exceeding a cutoff value of 120 ms was associated with CRT response, with predictive values of 86.8 and 81.4% in RBBB and NSCD, respectively. The QR-max index reflects the degree of LV electrical delay regardless of QRS duration in RBBB and NSCD patients and is a useful indicator of suitability for CRT in non-LBBB patients.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1572-8595
Volume :
58
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31807986
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00671-3