Back to Search
Start Over
Concurrent cisplatin or cetuximab with radiotherapy for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer: Medical resource use, costs, and quality-adjusted survival from the De-ESCALaTE HPV trial.
- Source :
-
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) [Eur J Cancer] 2020 Jan; Vol. 124, pp. 178-185. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 30. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: The De-ESCALaTE HPV trial confirmed the dominance of cisplatin over cetuximab for tumour control in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Here, we present the analysis of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), resource use, and health care costs in the trial, as well as complete 2-year survival and recurrence.<br />Materials and Methods: Resource use and HRQoL data were collected at intervals from the baseline to 24 months post treatment (PT). Health care costs were estimated using UK-based unit costs. Missing data were imputed. Differences in mean EQ-5D-5L utility index and adjusted cumulative quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and linear regression, respectively. Mean resource usage and costs were compared through two-sample t-tests.<br />Results: 334 patients were randomised to cisplatin (n = 166) or cetuximab (n = 168). Two-year overall survival (97·5% vs 90·0%, HR: 3.268 [95% CI 1·451 to 7·359], p = 0·0251) and recurrence rates (6·4% vs 16·0%, HR: 2·67 [1·38 to 5·15]; p = 0·0024) favoured cisplatin. No significant differences in EQ-5D-5L utility scores were detected at any time point. At 24 months PT, mean difference was 0·107 QALYs in favour of cisplatin (95% CI: 0·186 to 0·029, p = 0·007) driven by the mortality difference. Health care costs were similar across all categories except the procurement cost and delivery of the systemic agent, with cetuximab significantly more expensive than cisplatin (£7779 [P < 0.001]). Consequently, total costs at 24 months PT averaged £13517 (SE: £345) per patient for cisplatin and £21064 (SE: £400) for cetuximab (mean difference £7547 [95% CI: £6512 to £8582]).<br />Conclusions: Cisplatin chemoradiotherapy provided more QALYs and was less costly than cetuximab bioradiotherapy, remaining standard of care for nonsurgical treatment of HPV-positive OPSCC.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Cetuximab economics
Chemoradiotherapy economics
Chemoradiotherapy standards
Chemoradiotherapy statistics & numerical data
Cisplatin economics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Care Costs statistics & numerical data
Health Resources economics
Health Resources statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local blood
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local economics
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local prevention & control
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms economics
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms mortality
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms virology
Papillomaviridae isolation & purification
Papillomavirus Infections economics
Papillomavirus Infections mortality
Papillomavirus Infections virology
Quality of Life
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck economics
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck mortality
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck virology
Standard of Care
United Kingdom
Cetuximab therapeutic use
Chemoradiotherapy methods
Cisplatin therapeutic use
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local epidemiology
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms therapy
Papillomavirus Infections therapy
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-0852
- Volume :
- 124
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31794928
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.025