Back to Search
Start Over
Dual time point 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer.
- Source :
-
BMC cancer [BMC Cancer] 2019 Nov 27; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 1146. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 27. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Background: To evaluate the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of the percentage change between maximum standardized uptake value (SUV <subscript>max</subscript> ) at 60 min (SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1) and SUV <subscript>max</subscript> at 120 min (SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 2) (ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> %) using dual time point <superscript>18</superscript> F-fluorodeoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography ( <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT) in breast cancer.<br />Methods: Four hundred and sixty-four patients with primary breast cancer underwent <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative staging. ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> % was defined as (SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 2 - SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1) / SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 × 100. We explored the optimal cutoff value of SUV <subscript>max</subscript> parameters (SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 and ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> %) referring to the event of relapse by using receiver operator characteristic curves. The clinicopathological and prognostic significances of the SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 and ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> % were analyzed by Cox's univariate and multivariate analyses.<br />Results: The optimal cutoff values of SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 and ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> % were 3.4 and 12.5, respectively. Relapse-free survival (RFS) curves were significantly different between high and low SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 groups (P = 0.0003) and also between high and low ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> % groups (P = 0.0151). In Cox multivariate analysis for RFS, SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.0267) but ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> % was not (P = 0.152). There was a weak correlation between SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 and ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> % (P < 0.0001, R <superscript>2</superscript> = 0.166). On combining SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 and ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> %, the subgroups of high SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 and high ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> % showed significantly worse prognosis than the other groups in terms of RFS (P = 0.0002).<br />Conclusion: Dual time point <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDG PET/CT evaluation can be a useful method for predicting relapse in patients with breast cancer. The combination of SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 and ΔSUV <subscript>max</subscript> % was able to identify subgroups with worse prognosis more accurately than SUV <subscript>max</subscript> 1 alone.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Algorithms
Biomarkers, Tumor
Breast Neoplasms etiology
Breast Neoplasms mortality
Disease Progression
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Breast Neoplasms diagnosis
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1471-2407
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- BMC cancer
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31775675
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6315-8