Back to Search Start Over

Global trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice - 2019 Update.

Authors :
Wolffsohn JS
Calossi A
Cho P
Gifford K
Jones L
Jones D
Guthrie S
Li M
Lipener C
Logan NS
Malet F
Peixoto-de-Matos SC
González-Méijome JM
Nichols JJ
Orr JB
Santodomingo-Rubido J
Schaefer T
Thite N
van der Worp E
Tarutta E
Iomdina E
Ali BM
Villa-Collar C
Abesamis-Dichoso C
Chen C
Pult H
Blaser P
Parra Sandra Johanna G
Iqbal F
Ramos R
Carrillo Orihuela G
Boychev N
Source :
Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association [Cont Lens Anterior Eye] 2020 Feb; Vol. 43 (1), pp. 9-17. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 21.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Purpose: A survey in 2015 identified a high level of eye care practitioner concern about myopia with a reported moderately high level of activity, but the vast majority still prescribed single vision interventions to young myopes. This research aimed to update these findings 4 years later.<br />Methods: A self-administrated, internet-based questionnaire was distributed in eight languages, through professional bodies to eye care practitioners globally. The questions examined: awareness of increasing myopia prevalence, perceived efficacy of available strategies and adoption levels of such strategies, and reasons for not adopting specific strategies.<br />Results: Of the 1336 respondents, concern was highest (9.0 ± 1.6; p < 0.001) in Asia and lowest (7.6 ± 2.2; p < 0.001) in Australasia. Practitioners from Asia also considered their clinical practice of myopia control to be the most active (7.7 ± 2.3; p < 0.001), the North American practitioners being the least active (6.3 ± 2.9; p < 0.001). Orthokeratology was perceived to be the most effective method of myopia control, followed by pharmaceutical approaches and approved myopia control soft contact lenses (p < 0.001). Although significant intra-regional differences existed, overall, most practitioners did not consider single-vision distance under-correction to be an effective strategy for attenuating myopia progression (79.6 %), but prescribed single vision spectacles or contact lenses as the primary mode of correction for myopic patients (63.6 ± 21.8 %). The main justifications for their reluctance to prescribe alternatives to single vision refractive corrections were increased cost (20.6 %) and inadequate information (17.6 %).<br />Conclusions: While practitioner concern about myopia and the reported level of activity have increased over the last 4 years, the vast majority of eye care clinicians still prescribe single vision interventions to young myopes. With recent global consensus evidence-based guidelines having been published, it is hoped that this will inform the practice of myopia management in future.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1476-5411
Volume :
43
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31761738
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2019.11.002