Back to Search Start Over

Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Comparison From the FRANCE-TAVI Registry.

Authors :
Van Belle E
Vincent F
Labreuche J
Auffret V
Debry N
Lefèvre T
Eltchaninoff H
Manigold T
Gilard M
Verhoye JP
Himbert D
Koning R
Collet JP
Leprince P
Teiger E
Duhamel A
Cosenza A
Schurtz G
Porouchani S
Lattuca B
Robin E
Coisne A
Modine T
Richardson M
Joly P
Rioufol G
Ghostine S
Bar O
Amabile N
Champagnac D
Ohlmann P
Meneveau N
Lhermusier T
Leroux L
Leclercq F
Gandet T
Pinaud F
Cuisset T
Motreff P
Souteyrand G
Iung B
Folliguet T
Commeau P
Cayla G
Bayet G
Darremont O
Spaulding C
Le Breton H
Delhaye C
Source :
Circulation [Circulation] 2020 Jan 28; Vol. 141 (4), pp. 243-259. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Nov 16.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: No randomized study powered to compare balloon expandable (BE) with self expanding (SE) transcatheter heart valves (THVs) on individual end points after transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been conducted to date.<br />Methods: From January 2013 to December 2015, the FRANCE-TAVI nationwide registry (Registry of Aortic Valve Bioprostheses Established by Catheter) included 12 141 patients undergoing BE-THV (Edwards, n=8038) or SE-THV (Medtronic, n=4103) for treatment of native aortic stenosis. Long term mortality status was available in all patients (median 20 months; interquartile range, 14 to 30). Patients treated with BE-THV (n=3910) were successfully matched 1:1 with 3910 patients treated with SE-THV by using propensity score (25 clinical, anatomical, and procedural variables) and by date of the procedure (within 3 months). The first coprimary outcome was ≥ moderate occurrence of paravalvular regurgitation or in-hospital mortality, or both. The second coprimary outcome was 2-year all-cause mortality.<br />Results: In propensity-matched analyses, the incidence of the first coprimary outcome was higher with SE-THV (19.8%) compared with BE-THV (11.9%; relative risk, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.46-1.91]; P <0.0001). Each component of the outcome was also higher in patients receiving SE-THV: ≥ moderate paravalvular regurgitation (15.5% versus 8.3%; relative risk, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.63-2.22]; P <0.0001) and in hospital mortality (5.6% versus 4.2%; relative risk, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.07-1.66]; P =0.01). During follow up, all cause mortality occurred in 899 patients treated with SE-THV (2-year mortality, 29.8%) and in 801 patients treated with BE-THV (2-year mortality, 26.6%; hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.06-1.29]; P =0.003). Similar results were found using inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score analysis.<br />Conclusion: The present study suggests that use of SE-THV was associated with a higher risk of paravalvular regurgitation and higher in-hospital and 2-year mortality compared with use of BE-THV. These data strongly support the need for a randomized trial sufficiently powered to compare the latest generation of SE-THV and BE-THV.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01777828.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1524-4539
Volume :
141
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Circulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31736356
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043785