Back to Search
Start Over
Trend and Economic Burden of Intravenous Narcotic Analgesic Utilization in Major Vascular Interventions in the United States.
- Source :
-
Annals of vascular surgery [Ann Vasc Surg] 2020 Jul; Vol. 66, pp. 289-300.e2. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 31. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: The use of IV narcotic analgesics (IVNA) within the context of vascular procedures is not fully described. We sought to evaluate the burden of IVNA including narcotic analgesia-related adverse drug events (NARADE), associated mortality and hospitalization cost in open and endovascular vascular procedures, and to compare it with nonnarcotic analgesia (IVNNA).<br />Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study in hospitals participating in Premier database (2009-2015). Logistic regression analysis was implemented to report the risks of NARADE and in-hospital mortality. Negative binomial regression was used to assess length of stay and generalized linear modeling was used to estimate the hospitalization cost.<br />Results: A total of 171,473 patients were identified. NARADE occurred in 6.2% of the cohort. NARADE group was similar in gender and race but was slightly older (median age 71 vs. 70; P < 0.001). After risk-adjustment, NARADE risk was higher in patients who received IVNA-alone in carotid and lower extremity revascularization (LER) [OR (odds ratio) (95% confidence interval [CI]): 1.17 (1.02-1.34) and 1.31 (1.14-1.50)] or combined with IVNNA [OR (95% CI): 1.34 (1.13-1.59) and 1.81 (1.54-2.13)], respectively. Patients receiving aortic repair benefited from the use of IVNA + IVNNA [OR (95% CI): 0.82 (0.69-0.98)]. Occurrence of NARADE doubled the LOS, amplified mortality risk and increased cost in all domains. NARADE increased the odds of mortality by 24.3, 6.5 (4.9-8.68) and 16.6 times and added $5,368, $12,737 and $11,349 to the cost of carotid, aortic and LER interventions, respectively. In contrast, IVNNA was not associated with NARADE risk, increased LOS or cost and showed a survival benefit in patients undergoing open aortic repair [aOR (95% CI): 0.52 (0.36-0.75)].<br />Conclusions and Relevance: The use of opioid-based narcotics had increased the risk of NARADE, resources utilization and NARADE-related mortality. Yet the use of nonopioid-based analgesic was safe, did not increase the cost and reduced mortality in open AA repair. This entices shifting the paradigm toward exploring nonopioid-based analgesia options in order to replace or minimize opioid requirements.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Administration, Intravenous
Aged
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic adverse effects
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Databases, Factual
Endovascular Procedures adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures mortality
Endovascular Procedures trends
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Economic
Narcotics adverse effects
Pain Management adverse effects
Pain Management mortality
Pain Management trends
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
Vascular Surgical Procedures adverse effects
Vascular Surgical Procedures mortality
Vascular Surgical Procedures trends
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic administration & dosage
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic economics
Drug Costs trends
Endovascular Procedures economics
Hospital Costs trends
Narcotics administration & dosage
Narcotics economics
Pain Management economics
Vascular Surgical Procedures economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1615-5947
- Volume :
- 66
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Annals of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31678548
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.076