Back to Search Start Over

Irrigated vs. Non-irrigated Catheters in the Ablation of Accessory Pathways.

Authors :
Siroky GP
Hazari M
Younan Z
Patel A
Balog J
Rudnick A
Kassotis J
Kostis WJ
Coromilas J
Saluja D
Source :
Journal of cardiovascular translational research [J Cardiovasc Transl Res] 2020 Aug; Vol. 13 (4), pp. 612-617. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 29.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

There is a paucity of data comparing irrigated to non-irrigated catheters in the ablation of accessory pathways (AP) in adult patients. Retrospective analysis of first-time AP ablations performed at our institution from May 2010 to June 2017. A total of 69 AP ablations were studied; irrigated catheters were used in 78.3% cases. Mean age was 40.9 ± 14.3 years and 56.7% were male. Among APs, 63.8% were left sided and 56.5% were concealed. The total procedure time was 232.0 ± 89.0 min, ablation time was 3.1 ± 5.1 min, and fluoroscopy time was 13.9 ± 15.4 min. The overall acute success rate of ablation was 62/69 (89%). Success rates trended higher with irrigated catheters in both groups and were significant for the population as a whole (94.4% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.04). Analyzing the entire cohort, success rates were significantly higher in ablations using irrigated catheters.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1937-5395
Volume :
13
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cardiovascular translational research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31664613
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-019-09926-w