Back to Search
Start Over
Multicenter Evaluation of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Extraction and Downstream Analyses for the Development of Standardized (Pre)analytical Work Flows.
- Source :
-
Clinical chemistry [Clin Chem] 2020 Jan 01; Vol. 66 (1), pp. 149-160. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: In cancer patients, circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) can contain tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA), which enables noninvasive diagnosis, real-time monitoring, and treatment susceptibility testing. However, ctDNA fractions are highly variable, which challenges downstream applications. Therefore, established preanalytical work flows in combination with cost-efficient and reproducible reference materials for ccfDNA analyses are crucial for analytical validity and subsequently for clinical decision-making.<br />Methods: We describe the efforts of the Innovative Medicines Initiative consortium CANCER-ID (http://www.cancer-id.eu) for comparing different technologies for ccfDNA purification, quantification, and characterization in a multicenter setting. To this end, in-house generated mononucleosomal DNA (mnDNA) from lung cancer cell lines carrying known TP53 mutations was spiked in pools of plasma from healthy donors generated from 2 different blood collection tubes (BCTs). ccfDNA extraction was performed at 15 partner sites according to their respective routine practice. Downstream analysis of ccfDNA with respect to recovery, integrity, and mutation analysis was performed centralized at 4 different sites.<br />Results: We demonstrate suitability of mnDNA as a surrogate for ccfDNA as a process quality control from nucleic acid extraction to mutation detection. Although automated extraction protocols and quantitative PCR-based quantification methods yielded the most consistent and precise results, some kits preferentially recovered spiked mnDNA over endogenous ccfDNA. Mutated TP53 fragments derived from mnDNA were consistently detected using both next-generation sequencing-based deep sequencing and droplet digital PCR independently of BCT.<br />Conclusions: This comprehensive multicenter comparison of ccfDNA preanalytical and analytical work flows is an important contribution to establishing evidence-based guidelines for clinically feasible (pre)analytical work flows.<br /> (© 2019 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.)
- Subjects :
- Blood Specimen Collection
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids chemistry
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids standards
Circulating Tumor DNA blood
DNA Mutational Analysis
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing standards
Humans
Neoplasms genetics
Neoplasms pathology
Nucleosomes genetics
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Pre-Analytical Phase
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction standards
Reference Standards
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 genetics
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids metabolism
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing methods
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1530-8561
- Volume :
- 66
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Clinical chemistry
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31628139
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2019.306837