Back to Search
Start Over
Is p-Phenylenediamine Still a Prevalent Contact Allergen in Spain?
- Source :
-
Actas dermo-sifiliograficas [Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed)] 2020 Jan 02; Vol. 111 (1), pp. 47-52. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 15. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Objectives: To analyze trends in the prevalence of contact sensitization to p-phenylenediamine between 2004 and 2014, taking into consideration that the concentration of this product in cosmetics was regulated in 2009. To explore risk factors for contact allergy to p-phenylenediamine.<br />Material and Methods: Retrospective observational study of patients suspected of having contact dermatitis from allergy to p-phenylenediamine during the years between 2004 and 2015 in 8 tertiary level hospitals. The patients underwent patch testing (TRUE-test) with the standard series of the Spanish Research Group on Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergies. This series included p-phenylenediamine 1%. We followed international recommendations for the statistical analysis of data related to contact allergies.<br />Results: Three hundred eighty-six out of 9341 patients (4.1%) had positive reactions to p-phenylenediamine. The prevalence tended to decrease in the early years (2004-2007) and then leveled off at around 4%. Risk factors for developing contact dermatitis from p-phenylenediamine were sex, age over 40 years, multiple sensitivities, and profession, notably workers in hair salons and those who handle rubber and plastics.<br />Conclusions: The prevalence of p-phenylenediamine allergy remains high among patients with contact eczema. Risk factors for p-phenylenediamine contact allergy are consistent with previous reports.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 AEDV. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)
Details
- Language :
- English; Spanish; Castilian
- ISSN :
- 2173-5778
- Volume :
- 111
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Actas dermo-sifiliograficas
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31627850
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2019.04.003