[Hydrostatic enema outcome in patients with long history of ileocolic intussusception].

Purpose: Hydrostatic enema is the gold standard treatment for ileocolic intussusception in stable patients without radiologic complication. There is no consensus about the influence of long history of symptoms in the outcome of this treatment. The aim of this study is to determine whether hydrostatic enema is effective and safe in patients with history of ileocolic intussusception of over 24 hours.
Material and Methods: Retrospective review of all patients with ileocolic intussusception admitted to our hospital between 2014 and 2017. We divided the patients in whom enema was attempted on into two groups according to the length of history: over or under 24 hours. Statistical analysis was done by using the Fisher's exact test.
Results: In this study period 59 children presented with ileocolic intussusception. Duration of symptoms was variable (range 2 hours-7 days). Of the total of patients, initial hydrostatic enema was attempted on 49, with a success rate of 91.8% (45 patients). In the group of history <24 hours (33 patients, 67.3%) we observed a 93.9% effectiveness and in the group >24 hours (16 patients, 32.7%) effectiveness was 87.5%. Success rate showed no significant difference when comparing both groups (p=0.588). No complications were seen after enema reduction.
Conclusions: The use of hydrostatic enema in patients with long history of intussusception is successful and safe. We consider it to be the first-line treatment in stable patients with no radiologic complication, regardless the duration of symptoms.