Back to Search
Start Over
Interlimb differences in parameters of aerobic function and local profiles of deoxygenation during double-leg and counterweighted single-leg cycling.
- Source :
-
American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology [Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol] 2019 Dec 01; Vol. 317 (6), pp. R840-R851. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 16. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- It is typically assumed that in the context of double-leg cycling, dominant (DOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> ) and nondominant legs (NDOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> ) have similar aerobic capacity and both contribute equally to the whole body physiological responses. However, there is a paucity of studies that have systematically investigated maximal and submaximal aerobic performance and characterized the profiles of local muscle deoxygenation in relation to leg dominance. Using counterweighted single-leg cycling, this study explored whether peak O <subscript>2</subscript> consumption (V̇o <subscript>2peak</subscript> ), maximal lactate steady-state (MLSS <subscript>p</subscript> ), and profiles of local deoxygenation [HHb] would be different in the DOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> compared with the NDOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> . Twelve participants performed a series of double-leg and counterweighted single-leg DOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> and NDOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> ramp-exercise tests and 30-min constant-load trials. V̇o <subscript>2peak</subscript> was greater in the DOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> than in the NDOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> (2.87 ± 0.42 vs. 2.70 ± 0.39 L/min, P < 0.05). The difference in V̇o <subscript>2peak</subscript> persisted even after accounting for lean mass ( P < 0.05). Similarly, MLSS <subscript>p</subscript> was greater in the DOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> than in the NDOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> (118 ± 31 vs. 109 ± 31 W; P < 0.05). Furthermore, the amplitude of the [HHb] signal during ramp exercise was larger in the DOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> than in the NDOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> during both double-leg (26.0 ± 8.4 vs. 20.2 ± 8.8 µM, P < 0.05) and counterweighted single-leg cycling (18.5 ± 7.9 vs. 14.9 ± 7.5 µM, P < 0.05). Additionally, the amplitudes of the [HHb] signal were highly to moderately correlated with the mode-specific V̇o <subscript>2peak</subscript> values (ranging from 0.91 to 0.54). These findings showed in a group of young men that maximal and submaximal aerobic capacities were greater in the DOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> than in the NDOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> and that superior peripheral adaptations of the DOM <subscript>LEG</subscript> may underpin these differences. NEW & NOTEWORTHY It is typically assumed that the dominant and nondominant legs contribute equally to the whole physiological responses. In this study, we found that the dominant leg achieved greater peak O <subscript>2</subscript> uptake values, sustained greater power output while preserving whole body metabolic stability, and showed larger amplitudes of deoxygenation responses. These findings highlight heterogeneous aerobic capacities of the lower limbs, which have important implications when whole body physiological responses are examined.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1522-1490
- Volume :
- 317
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31617749
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00164.2019