Back to Search Start Over

Physiologic strain of SCBA confidence course training compared to circuit training and live-fire training.

Authors :
Wilkinson AF
Matias AA
Eddy CIK
Soares EM
King JL
Smith DL
Source :
Applied ergonomics [Appl Ergon] 2020 Jan; Vol. 82, pp. 102966. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Oct 07.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Firefighting is a dangerous occupation and even training carries substantial risks. Self-contained breathing apparatus confidence courses (SCBACC) are a common type of training.<br />Purpose: Compare the physiological strain of SCBACC to live-fire training (LFT) and circuit training (CT) among academy cadets.<br />Methods: Cadets wore physiologic status monitors to assess heart rate (HR) and estimated core temperature (ECT) during CT, LFT, and SCBACC of similar duration (33-38 min).<br />Results: Data from 52 cadet firefighters (28 ± 4 yrs old) were analyzed. ECT (38.6 ± 0.4 vs 39.3 ± 0.7 vs. 39.3 ± 0.6ᵒC), peak HR (182.6 ± 9.1 vs. 192.7 ± 9.5 vs 195.9 ± 9.6 bpm), and age-predicted maximal HR (APMHR%; 94.6 ± 4.6 vs 99.9 ± 4.9 vs. 101.5 ± 4.8%) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower for CT than SCBACC and LFT, respectively.<br />Conclusions: SCBACC produced physiological strain greater than CT and similar to LFT. SCBACC resulted in sustained HR at 100% of age-predicted maximal values, a peak ECT of 39.3 °C, and should be considered as physiologically stressful as LFT.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1872-9126
Volume :
82
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Applied ergonomics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31600711
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102966