Back to Search
Start Over
Safety of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease.
- Source :
-
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2019 Dec 23; Vol. 12 (24), pp. 2515-2524. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Sep 28. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess safety outcomes of femoropopliteal drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty using patient-level data from the Lutonix clinical program.<br />Background: A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of heterogenous trials and summary-level data identified increased long-term mortality in patients treated with paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents.<br />Methods: We evaluated DCB angioplasty (n = 1,093) and uncoated balloon angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA]) (n = 250) outcomes in LEVANT 1 (The Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Prevention of Femoropopliteal Restenosis), LEVANT 2 (Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries), and the LEVANT Japan Clinical Trial. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with Cox proportional hazards modeling.<br />Results: There were no significant differences in mortality rates between DCB angioplasty and PTA. The 5-year HR was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68 to 1.52) in the aggregated LEVANT trials. The 2-year HR after DCB angioplasty was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.25 to 3.95) in LEVANT 1, 1.40 (95% CI: 0.62 to 3.14) in LEVANT 2, and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.05 to 1.92) in the LEVANT Japan Clinical Trial. The 5-year HR was 1.60 (95% CI: 0.94 to 2.72) in LEVANT 2. Adverse events and causes of death were balanced, without clustering between DCB angioplasty and PTA. Patients who underwent paclitaxel or nonpaclitaxel reinterventions had higher survival rates than those who did not undergo reinterventions. Baseline covariates predicting mortality included, among others, age (HR: 1.03 per year; p < 0.0001), prior treatment of target lesion (HR: 1.67; p = 0.022), arrhythmia (HR: 1.65; p = 0.031), and diabetes (HR: 1.18; p = 0.047), without differences between the 2 arms. No dose-response relationship was identified when adjusted for key predictors of mortality.<br />Conclusions: Analyses of patient-level data identified no mortality differences between DCB angioplasty and PTA. Furthermore, the lack of dose-response relationships or clustering of causes of death argues against a causal relationship between paclitaxel and mortality. (LEVANT 1, The Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Prevention of Femoropopliteal Restenosis [LEVANT 1], NCT00930813; Moxy Drug Coated Balloon vs. Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arteries [LEVANT 2], NCT01412541; LEVANT 2 Continued Access Registry, NCT01628159; LEVANT Japan Clinical Trial, NCT01816412).<br /> (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angioplasty, Balloon adverse effects
Angioplasty, Balloon mortality
Cardiovascular Agents adverse effects
Cause of Death
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Paclitaxel adverse effects
Peripheral Arterial Disease diagnostic imaging
Peripheral Arterial Disease mortality
Peripheral Arterial Disease physiopathology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Patency
Angioplasty, Balloon instrumentation
Cardiovascular Agents administration & dosage
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Femoral Artery diagnostic imaging
Femoral Artery physiopathology
Paclitaxel administration & dosage
Peripheral Arterial Disease therapy
Popliteal Artery diagnostic imaging
Popliteal Artery physiopathology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1876-7605
- Volume :
- 12
- Issue :
- 24
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31575518
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.025