Back to Search
Start Over
Operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures is not cost-effective.
- Source :
-
Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery [J Shoulder Elbow Surg] 2020 Jan; Vol. 29 (1), pp. 27-35. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Sep 25. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: Conventional treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures is nonoperative. Recent studies have implied that operative treatment might result in a faster return to work, resulting in a decreased productivity loss for society. The cost utility of plate fixation vs. nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures has not previously been investigated using a societal perspective.<br />Methods: Decision analytical modeling of incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) was performed. Data on utility, hospitalization, and productivity costs were retrieved from a Danish randomized controlled trial. Supplementary data were taken from randomized controlled trials identified in the literature. A 1-year time horizon was applied, and all prices were reported with respect to a 2016 level.<br />Results: Operative treatment was associated with a larger QALY gain in patients and a higher cost compared with nonoperative treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated in Danish currency (Danish krone [kr]) at kr1,360,000 (€182,306) per QALY from a health-sector perspective and kr1,388,738 (€186,158) per QALY from a societal perspective. Considering a subgroup analysis of patients with a high-load shoulder profession, operative treatment was dominated by nonoperative treatment from a health-sector perspective. Considering a societal perspective, the ICER was estimated at -kr889,091 (-€119,181) per reduction of 1 QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the results were subject to uncertainty.<br />Conclusion: Operative treatment is not cost-effective when considering a threshold of €34,000/QALY. However, for a subgroup of patients with a high-load shoulder profession, operative treatment might be cost-effective compared with nonoperative treatment.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Bone Plates
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Support Techniques
Denmark
Diaphyses injuries
Efficiency
Fracture Fixation, Internal
Fractures, Bone surgery
Hospitalization economics
Humans
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Treatment Outcome
Clavicle injuries
Conservative Treatment economics
Cost of Illness
Fractures, Bone economics
Fractures, Bone therapy
Orthopedic Procedures economics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-6500
- Volume :
- 29
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31563507
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.020