Back to Search Start Over

Sugar Beet Pectin Supplementation Did Not Alter Profiles of Fecal Microbiota and Exhaled Breath in Healthy Young Adults and Healthy Elderly.

Authors :
An R
Wilms E
Smolinska A
Hermes GDA
Masclee AAM
de Vos P
Schols HA
van Schooten FJ
Smidt H
Jonkers DMAE
Zoetendal EG
Troost FJ
Source :
Nutrients [Nutrients] 2019 Sep 12; Vol. 11 (9). Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Sep 12.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Aging is accompanied with increased frailty and comorbidities, which is potentially associated with microbiome perturbations. Dietary fibers could contribute to healthy aging by beneficially impacting gut microbiota and metabolite profiles. We aimed to compare young adults with elderly and investigate the effect of pectin supplementation on fecal microbiota composition, short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) while using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design. Fifty-two young adults and 48 elderly consumed 15 g/day sugar beet pectin or maltodextrin for four weeks. Fecal and exhaled breath samples were collected before and after the intervention period. Fecal samples were used for microbiota profiling by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and for analysis of SCFAs by gas chromatography (GC). Breath was used for VOC analysis by GC-tof-MS. Young adults and elderly showed similar fecal SCFA and exhaled VOC profiles. Additionally, fecal microbiota profiles were similar, with five genera significantly different in relative abundance. Pectin supplementation did not significantly alter fecal microbiota, SCFA or exhaled VOC profiles in elderly or young adults. In conclusion, aside from some minor differences in microbial composition, healthy elderly and young adults showed comparable fecal microbiota composition and activity, which were not altered by pectin supplementation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2072-6643
Volume :
11
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Nutrients
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31547291
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11092193