Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of glenoid labral tears: comparison between dual-energy CT arthrography and MR arthrography of the shoulder.

Authors :
Foti G
Mantovani W
Catania M
Avanzi P
Caia S
Zorzi C
Carbognin G
Source :
La Radiologia medica [Radiol Med] 2020 Jan; Vol. 125 (1), pp. 39-47. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Sep 20.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography arthrography (DE-CTA) and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) of the shoulder in depicting glenoid labral tears.<br />Methods: This prospective institutional review board-approved study included 47 consecutive patients (28 males, 19 females; mean age of 34.2 years) studied between January 2017 and October 2018. All patients underwent DE-CTA and MRA the same day. Two radiologists (25 and 11 years of experience, respectively), blinded to clinical data, evaluated the presence labral tears on virtual-blended 120 kV standard CTA and on DE-CTA images. A third radiologist (18 years of experience) evaluated the MRA images. Diagnostic accuracy values were calculated by using surgery as standard of reference. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreements were calculated with k statistics. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.<br />Results: Surgery revealed the presence of labral tears in 38/47 patients (80.9%). Sensitivity and specificity values in diagnosing labral tears were 84.2% and 77.8% for MRA (Reader 3), 84.2% and 77.8% for CTA (Reader 1), 84.2% and 88.9% for CTA (Reader 2), 89.5% and 88.9% for DE-CTA (Reader 1), and 92.1% and 88.9% for DE-CTA (Reader 2). A nonsignificant increase in AUC values with respect to MRA was obtained by reading the CTA (p = 0.470) and DE-CTA dataset (p = 0.217), respectively. Inter-observer agreements were near perfect for CTA (k = 0.84) and substantial for DE-CTA reading (k = 0.76). Intra-observer agreements were near perfect both for CTA (k = 0.88) and for DE-CTA reading (k = 0.82).<br />Conclusion: DE-CTA and MRA were not different in terms of diagnostic performance.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1826-6983
Volume :
125
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
La Radiologia medica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31541346
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01083-z