Back to Search Start Over

Validation of a Proposed Algorithm for Assistance Titration During Proportional Assist Ventilation With Load-Adjustable Gain Factors.

Authors :
Amargiannitakis V
Gialamas I
Pediaditis E
Soundoulounaki S
Prinianakis G
Vaporidi K
Akoumianaki E
Proklou A
Alexopoulou C
Georgopoulos D
Kondili E
Source :
Respiratory care [Respir Care] 2020 Jan; Vol. 65 (1), pp. 36-44. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Sep 17.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to validate a recently proposed algorithm for assistance titration during proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors, based on a noninvasive estimation of maximum inspiratory pressure (peak P <subscript>mus</subscript> ) and inspiratory effort (pressure-time product [PTP] peak P <subscript>mus</subscript> ).<br />Methods: Retrospective analysis of the recordings obtained from 26 subjects ventilated on proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors under different conditions, each considered as an experimental case. The estimated inspiratory output (peak P <subscript>mus</subscript> ) and effort (PTP-peak P <subscript>mus</subscript> ) were compared with the actual-determined by the measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure- and the derived PTP. Validation of the algorithm was performed by assessing the accuracy of peak P <subscript>mus</subscript> in predicting the actual inspiratory muscle effort and indicating the appropriate level of assist.<br />Results: In the 63 experimental cases analyzed, a limited agreement was observed between the estimated and the actual inspiratory muscle pressure (-11 to 10 cm H <subscript>2</subscript> O) and effort (-82 to 125 cm H <subscript>2</subscript> O × s/min). The sensitivity and specificity of peak P <subscript>mus</subscript> to predict the range of the actual inspiratory effort was 81.2% and 58.1%, respectively. In 49% of experimental cases, the level of assist indicated by the algorithm differed from that indicated by the transdiaphragmatic pressure and PTP.<br />Conclusions: The proposed algorithm had limited accuracy in estimating inspiratory muscle effort and with indicating the appropriate level of assist.<br />Competing Interests: Drs Amargiannitakis and Gialamas contributed equally to this work. Drs Kondili, Vaporidi, and Georgopoulos have received lecture fees (honoraria) from Covidien.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1943-3654
Volume :
65
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Respiratory care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31530626
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06988