Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of emergency department to hospital antibiograms: Influence of patient risk factors on susceptibility.
- Source :
-
The American journal of emergency medicine [Am J Emerg Med] 2020 Jun; Vol. 38 (6), pp. 1153-1158. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Aug 22. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Objectives: Traditional antibiograms use local resistance patterns and susceptibility data to guide empiric antimicrobial therapy selection. However, antibiograms are rarely unit-specific and do not account for patient-specific risk factors.<br />Methods: This retrospective, single-center descriptive study used culture and susceptibility data from January 1 to December 31, 2016 to develop an Emergency Department (ED)-specific antibiogram and compare the antimicrobial susceptibilities of the most commonly identified organisms to the hospital antibiogram. All ED isolates were further stratified by the following risk factors that may influence antimicrobial susceptibility: age, disposition from ED, previous antimicrobial use and/or hospitalization within 30 days, and presenting location (i.e. healthcare facility residence versus community).<br />Results: A total of 2158 isolates from the ED were included: Escherichia coli (n = 1244), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 232), Proteus mirabilis (n = 131), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 103), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 303), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 145). There were no statistically significant differences between the ED and hospital antibiogram (n = 5739) with the exception of Escherichia coli. The hospital antibiogram overestimated Escherichia coli resistance rates for cefazolin (20% vs 15.6%, p = 0.049), ceftriaxone (9.6% vs 6.4%, p < 0.033), and ciprofloxacin (23.7% vs 15.4%, p < 0.006). There were significantly more risk factors present in patients admitted versus discharged from the ED (p < 0.001). Healthcare facility residence had the greatest influence on susceptibility, especially Escherichia coli (81.8% vs 34.9%, p < 0.001) and Proteus mirabilis (75.3% vs 33%, p < 0.001) ciprofloxacin susceptibility.<br />Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences between the ED and hospital antibiogram with the exception of Escherichia coli. However, development of an ED-specific antibiogram can aid physicians in prescribing appropriate empiric therapy when risk factors are included.<br />Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to report.<br /> (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Bacteria drug effects
Bacterial Infections epidemiology
Bacterial Infections microbiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Male
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
United States epidemiology
Anti-Bacterial Agents therapeutic use
Bacteria isolation & purification
Bacterial Infections drug therapy
Emergency Service, Hospital
Hospitalization statistics & numerical data
Risk Assessment methods
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-8171
- Volume :
- 38
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The American journal of emergency medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31495521
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158403