Back to Search Start Over

Aspirin and Primary Prevention in Patients with Diabetes-A Critical Evaluation of Available Randomized Trials and Meta-Analyses.

Authors :
Schrör K
Kristensen SD
Storey RF
Verheugt FWA
Source :
Thrombosis and haemostasis [Thromb Haemost] 2019 Oct; Vol. 119 (10), pp. 1573-1582. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Aug 20.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Primary prevention of cardiovascular events with aspirin in patients with elevated cardiovascular risk, including diabetics, is currently under intense discussion. Data from meta-analyses suggests that the efficacy of aspirin in these patients is low, whereas there is a significantly increased bleeding tendency. However, meta-analyses are based on trials that differ in many important aspects, including study selection. Fresh insights were expected from the ASCEND trial, by far the largest primary, randomized, placebo-controlled prevention trial in diabetics without known cardiovascular disease. There was a small but significant reduction in serious cardiovascular events by aspirin (8.6% vs. 9.6%) but also a significant increase in major bleeding: 4.1% versus 3.2%. Unfortunately, this trial did not meet the desired annual rate of elevated vascular risk of ≥ 2%. It was only 1.2 to 1.3%, and thus in the range of other primary prevention trials in low-risk patients. Apart from potential compliance problems, possible explanations for the small cardioprotective effect of antiplatelet treatment include a healthy lifestyle as well as improved vascular protection by comedication with vasoactive and anti-inflammatory drugs, such as statins or antihypertensive agents, as well as proton-pump inhibitors that might modify bleeding, specifically in the upper gastrointestinal tract-the most frequently affected site. Also, the introduction of new antidiabetic drugs with more favorable cardiovascular effects may in part explain the low event rate. ASCEND, similar to ARRIVE, did not study patients at elevated (as planned) but only at low vascular risk and, therefore, was largely confirmatory of earlier primary prevention trials.<br />Competing Interests: K.S. reports personal fees from Bayer; S.D.K. reports personal fees from Bayer and Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, grants, personal fees, and other from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. R.F.S. reports grants and personal fees from PlaqueTec and AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Avacta, Novartis, Idorsia, Thromboserin, Haemonetics, outside the submitted work. In addition, R.F.S. has a patent PCT/GB2017/050692 pending. F.W.A.V. has nothing to disclose.<br /> (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2567-689X
Volume :
119
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Thrombosis and haemostasis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31430800
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1694774