Back to Search
Start Over
Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review.
- Source :
-
Rheumatology and therapy [Rheumatol Ther] 2019 Sep; Vol. 6 (3), pp. 317-338. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Aug 05. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Introduction: In 2016, SB4 (Benepali <superscript>®</superscript> ) became the first etanercept (ETN) biosimilar to obtain marketing authorisation in Europe. Despite robust analytical and clinical comparisons, outstanding questions remain on SB4 use in routine practice.<br />Methods: A systematic search for publications on real-world evidence of SB4 effectiveness, safety and drug survival was undertaken using search terms (SB4 OR Benepali OR biosimilar etanercept OR innovator etanercept) in the BIOSIS <superscript>®</superscript> Toxicology, BIOSIS Previews <superscript>®</superscript> , Embase <superscript>®</superscript> and MEDLINE <superscript>®</superscript> databases up to 17 January 2019.<br />Results: Of 959 articles identified, eight journal articles, two journal letters and 23 congress abstracts were selected on criteria of original real-world evidence with a clinical focus. As expected with real-world evidence, quality scoring showed that the evidence had high external validity but lower internal validity. A total of 13,552 patients were described across nine European countries and all approved SB4 indications: 2499 were ETN-naïve and 11,053 switched from reference ETN to SB4 (switchers). Switch acceptance rates (a combination of clinicians offering and patients accepting initiation on SB4) ranged between 51.6% and 99.0%; patient support programmes positively contributed to acceptance. Disease activity was generally similar pre- and post-switch (typically 3-month timeframe). Retention rates across studies were at least 75% (up to 12 months follow-up). No new safety signals were identified. Differences in discontinuation rates versus historic controls reported in some studies may have been influenced by differences in treatment practices, lack of clinician confidence and nocebo effects.<br />Conclusion: Nearly 2500 ETN-naïve patients have been initiated on SB4 and outcomes are similar to those patients receiving reference ETN. Overall this systematic review of real-world evidence provides additional reassurance that SB4 is as effective and safe as reference ETN in both switched and naïve patients.<br />Funding: Biogen International GmbH.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2198-6576
- Volume :
- 6
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Rheumatology and therapy
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31385263
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-019-00169-4