Back to Search
Start Over
Glycemic Variability and Hypoglycemic Excursions With Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared to Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Highest Risk Type 1 Diabetes.
- Source :
-
Journal of diabetes science and technology [J Diabetes Sci Technol] 2020 May; Vol. 14 (3), pp. 567-574. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Aug 02. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Background: The I-HART CGM study has shown that real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has greater beneficial impact on hypoglycemia than intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (iscCGM) in adults with type 1 diabetes at high risk (Gold score ≥4 or recent severe hypoglycemia using insulin injections). In this subanalysis, we present the impact of rtCGM and iscCGM on glycemic variability (GV).<br />Methods: Forty participants were recruited to this parallel group study. Following two weeks of blinded rtCGM (DexcomG4), participants were randomized to rtCGM (Dexcom G5; n = 20) or iscCGM (Freestyle Libre; n = 20) for eight weeks. An open-extension phase enabled participants on rtCGM to continue for a further eight weeks and those on iscCGM to switch to rtCGM over this period. Glycemic variability measures at baseline, 8- and 16-week endpoints were compared between groups.<br />Results: At the eight-week endpoint, between-group differences demonstrated significant reduction in several GV measures with rtCGM compared to iscCGM (GRADE%hypoglycemia, index of glycemic control [IGC], and average daily risk range [ADRR]; P < .05). Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring reduced mean average glucose and glycemic variability percentage and GRADE%hyperglycemia compared with rtCGM ( P < .05). At 16 weeks, the iscCGM group switching to rtCGM showed significant improvement in GRADE%hypoglycemia, personal glycemic status, IGC, and ADRR.<br />Conclusion: Our data suggest most, but not all, GV measures improve with rtCGM compared with iscCGM, particularly those measures associated with the risk of hypoglycemia. Selecting appropriate glucose monitoring technology to address GV in this high-risk cohort is important to minimize the risk of glucose extremes and severe hypoglycemia.<br />Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03028220.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Biomarkers blood
Blood Glucose metabolism
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 blood
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 diagnosis
Female
Humans
Hypoglycemia blood
Hypoglycemia chemically induced
Hypoglycemia diagnosis
London
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Blood Chemical Analysis instrumentation
Blood Glucose drug effects
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 drug therapy
Glycemic Control adverse effects
Hypoglycemia prevention & control
Hypoglycemic Agents adverse effects
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1932-2968
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of diabetes science and technology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31375042
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819867688