Back to Search Start Over

Institutional Variation in Quality of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Implantation: A Cohort Study.

Authors :
Ranasinghe I
Labrosciano C
Horton D
Ganesan A
Curtis JP
Krumholz HM
McGavigan A
Hossain S
Air T
Hariharaputhiran S
Source :
Annals of internal medicine [Ann Intern Med] 2019 Sep 03; Vol. 171 (5), pp. 309-317. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jul 30.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are associated with procedure-related complications, yet little is known about variation in complication rates among institutions that may suggest disparities in care quality.<br />Objective: To assess institutional variation in risk-standardized complication rates (RSCRs) for CIED.<br />Design: Cohort study.<br />Setting: 174 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand, 98 of which implanted at least 25 CIEDs during the study period.<br />Participants: 81 304 patients older than 18 years (mean, 74.7 years [SD, 12.4]; 37.9% female) who received a new CIED (65 711 permanent pacemakers [PPMs] and 15 593 implantable cardioverter-defibrillators [ICDs]) in 2010 to 2015.<br />Measurements: RSCRs and frequencies of major device-related complications during hospitalization or within 90 days of discharge.<br />Results: Of the cohort, 6664 patients (8.2%) had a major complication. Although complication rates were higher for ICDs than PPMs (10.04% vs. 7.76%), 76.5% of all complications were attributable to PPMs (5098 vs. 1566 for ICDs). Among hospitals that implanted at least 25 CIEDs, the median RSCR was 8.1%; however, rates varied from 5.3% to 14.3%, with 22 hospitals identified as having RSCRs that differed significantly from the national average. Similar variation was observed when RSCRs for PPM implantation (n = 96 hospitals) (median RSCR, 7.6% [range, 5.4% to 12.9%]) were considered separately from those for ICD placement (n = 68 hospitals) (median RSCR, 9.7% [range, 6.2% to 16.9%]) and persisted when only elective procedures were assessed (n = 88 hospitals) (median RSCR, 7.4% [range, 4.7% to 13.0%]).<br />Limitation: Possible unmeasured confounding from the use of administrative data.<br />Conclusion: CIED complications are common and vary among hospitals, suggesting institutional variation in CIED care quality. Concerted clinical and policy interventions are needed to address CIED-related complications. These efforts should preferentially target PPMs, because most CIED complications are attributable to these devices.<br />Primary Funding Source: The Hospitals Contribution Fund Research Foundation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1539-3704
Volume :
171
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of internal medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31357210
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-2810