Back to Search Start Over

Impact of lipoprotein apheresis on thrombotic parameters in patients with refractory angina and raised lipoprotein(a): Findings from a randomized controlled cross-over trial.

Authors :
Khan TZ
Gorog DA
Arachchillage DJ
Ahnström J
Rhodes S
Donovan J
Banya W
Pottle A
Barbir M
Pennell DJ
Source :
Journal of clinical lipidology [J Clin Lipidol] 2019 Sep - Oct; Vol. 13 (5), pp. 788-796. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jul 02.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Raised lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a cardiovascular risk factor common in patients with refractory angina. The apolipoprotein(a) component of Lp(a) exhibits structural homology with plasminogen and can enhance thrombosis and impair fibrinolysis.<br />Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess the effect of lipoprotein apheresis on markers of thrombosis and fibrinolysis in patients with high Lp(a).<br />Methods: In a prospective, single-blind, crossover trial, 20 patients with refractory angina and raised Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL were randomized to three months of weekly lipoprotein apheresis or sham. Blood taken before and after apheresis/sham was assessed using the Global Thrombosis Test, to assess time taken for in vitro thrombus formation (occlusion time) and endogenous fibrinolysis (lysis time), as well as von Willebrand Factor, fibrinogen, D-dimer, thrombin/anti-thrombin III complex, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2, and thrombin generation assays.<br />Results: Lp(a) was significantly reduced by apheresis (100.2 [interquartile range {IQR}, 69.6143.0] vs 24.8 [17.2,34.0] mg/dL, P = .0001) but not by sham (P = .0001 between treatment arms). Apheresis prolonged occlusion time (576 ± 116 s vs 723 ± 142 s, P < .0001) reflecting reduced platelet reactivity and reduced lysis time (1340 [1128, 1682] s vs 847 [685,1302] s, P = .0006) reflecting enhanced fibrinolysis, without corresponding changes with sham. Apheresis, but not sham, reduced von Willebrand Factor (149 [89.0, 164] vs 64.2 [48.5, 89.8] IU/dL, P = .0001), and fibrinogen (3.12 ± 0.68 vs 2.20 ± 0.53 g/L, P < .0001), and increased prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 (158.16 [128.77, 232.09] vs 795.12 [272.55, 1201.00] pmol/L, P = .0006). There was no change in D-dimer, thrombin/anti-thrombin III complex, or thrombin generation assay with apheresis or sham.<br />Conclusion: Lipoprotein apheresis reduces Lp(a) and improves some thrombotic and fibrinolytic parameters in patients with refractory angina.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1933-2874
Volume :
13
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of clinical lipidology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31353231
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2019.06.009